Even more so if that nation builds and modify it in house, Look at the Canadian Gripen E quiet an interesting salutation there
1 Like
Just because they test it doesn’t mean you guys claim it. 428th is NOT a excuse for you guys to claim it
1 Like
Japan had the FCU for a whole year before Thailand got added, IAR 93 got nothing to do with Italy and Russia got nothing to do with the Praga.
Japan makes their F-15 domestically, Israel modifies theirs themselves. The rest are all pure US export, with the exception of the very latest F-15SA due to them getting Israeli avionics (but they can just add an earlier version)
No the problem is us air doesn’t need all the f15 in the world. I do NOT want to see premium or squadron f15 in the tech tree. A premium f18 is already bad but a f15? Oh hell no
4 Likes
Yeah they just got three F/A-18’s they should be fine for at least 2 updates
3 Likes
Yeah, but combined with it being a US jet, it works.
Also, what about a USAF squadron is an excuse? I thought you wanted fully USAF/USN/USMC stuff in air tree? 428th is a USAF squadron last I checked
Yeah and the f15sg is still belong to the rsaf last time i checked. There just there to TRAIN
1 Like
If it’s designed and built by America, it’s American.
1 Like
A scratch on the surface of possible additions. There are still a solid 2 legacy hornets left (not counting two seaters)
sure, but still being operated under USAF squadron
Yeah but it doesn’t means American air tree should get all the f15. Especially no premium or squadron ones
1 Like
We already don’t.
If you get 5 aircraft within 2 updates then I want my Indian Su-30 please
Ew
Fight fire with fire my man lol
And it fully belong to republic of singapore air force. 428th is still not a good excuse. Just be happy you gonna get a f15ex
But yeah the US can’t be happy without one update not adding anything to them
Or just have no fire to begin with. That works, too.
Can’t m8 because the US always want more
1 Like