Ye I’ve seen that posted around a few times. It’s a shame that they don’t bother with it, could actually make certain planes viable again.
But here we are.
Inb4 the Argentine A-4AR is just a A-4M “giga late” in their book, just so they can make the excuse of giving it, uhh let’s say, only dumb bombs, no radar and 9Bs.
Surely they’d be like “that fits the “””“”““balans””“”“”“”
(((((
I agree, it would make thing a bit more clear. Would in general be good with a short FAQ on the reporting.
I have no idea, best to ask them about it once you get your message answered (or edit the message already and add the questions you have).
Ask who? They’ll just close it down most of the time. It won’t make them money so why should they bother.
And then once you ask on forums they’ll make up something crazy just to answer and dismiss the question.
Has there been any consideration given to vehicles using a 40mm automatic grenade launcher as the primary weapon? M430A1 rounds have 76mm pen, and many of the modern vehicles integrate a laser rangefinder making the low muzzle velocity easier to aim. They are very viable as light tanks and many tech trees could get them.
I get why it’s no longer published as to who it was that actioned the report. but some way to send them a DM would be nice. So I don’t have to bother others.
I was referring to the A-4Ms with Limas, but yes, I understand your point.
In my neighborhood this is called “putting in fill material”
1 Like
Do you mean the A-4E? doesn’t it have a normal variant in the tree?
1 Like
Nah nah all gucci, I merely tried to expand that point further.
I believe there’s a russian word for that kind of sloppy work, the “make do and drop the topic” kinda thing.
1 Like
Nope.
One’s copypastad as a mid life one into the ISR tree but also lacks its actual weaponry but that’s it. No tech tree equivalents exist.
He meant the A-4M which was used up until about 2000.
Take his comment as half sarcastic with the A-4M “late” part. He was referring to the sloppiness of that naming scheme.
its called “balancing decisions”
you know, those decisions that vary from plane to plane and nation to nation depending on the weather, what the boss had to eat, was there traffic on the roads. you know, balance!
3 Likes
It doesn’t have it and it won’t have it, since it is probably the best A-4E in its BR, in the entire game, by far, it’s early.
You got it
“Early” “Late”… sounds like pillow stuffing
1 Like
That same thing you just said should be pinned on top of the bug reporting site so people would stop bothering lol. ( And I’m sure they would)
Instead we see people try their best then get insanely mad ( I wonder why) and say screw it we post nakde pics, racial slur copypastas and memes. What a great site that is right now, surely a working system.
1 Like
In that case, put a name F/A-18A (1982) or something like that. Idk… this whole thing is real because we’re talking about Finland. They wouldn’t have done the same with another nation.
I mean, it was always filler material, called the “Finnish subtree” and the only indigenous vehicle in the entire TT is an event.
TRUE.
Work hard to find sources for an aircraft or tank for 2 options to occur:
not enough info… (yet, dont mind the 3 notebook pages in russian that is used to balance the tank, we cant accept this because, uhh, manufacturing lies)
OR
Nope, youre not having that on said vehicle because of “balancing decisions”
Truly the game of all time
2 Likes
Or, in the rare case of the Kurnass 2000, we get a nice “no further improvements will be made” to top off the day/week/month/year of hard work.
3 Likes
but it gets worse tho.
Those balancing decisions mean nothing because at the end of the day, its balanced around “which nation has the most incompetent players in” rather then what the vehicle can actually do. PICK A LANE GAIJIN?
1 Like
They can’t do that though because it has the AN/AAS-38 of which there were only 4 available by the 1991 Gulf War, if they date it, they’d have to change it because they can’t have this 90s targeting pod on an 80s aircraft
Ok, I’ve literally thrown almost everything I could (short of 1-34-1, iykyk)
hopefully it goes though, this time.
[DEV]The F-14B should be impacted by this change to IRST/EOTS
Seriously though the, character limit on naming reports probably took the longest.
3 Likes
All talk of historical accuracy and weapons and then you still have to grind AIM-9Ls (Finland never had them)
Tons of planes have JHMCS programs implemented and 9X capability and can exist in the game without 9X but this one is a problem apparently even though there is still a more modern version
Extremely hypocritical
2 Likes