Which affects the engine overheating and cooking itself, forcing you to operate at a lower throttle setting to prevent that from happening. But from my understanding. IR Signature with regard to missiles has nothing to do with the engine temps.
This is why an F-5 sat on full reheat is “colder” than an F-117.
They could of at least buffed AAM-4 at least that would of brought the F-15J more closer to 14.0 level.
Or even IR/UV for AAM-3 both buffs would easily be satisfactory for 14.0 if they really dont want to add F-2 for now at least its SOMETHING.
Appears to be a duplicate. This one has been forwarded: Community Bug Reporting System
Connected the two reports up.
Requires some further review. Best handled after the processing of current dev reports.
Also a duplicate. Linked with the forwarded report: Community Bug Reporting System
Will be checked.
I have an engine sound report open for the CV90s aswell
Scratch that. Internal reports already exist for this. Connected that up too.
Hi Smin, could you check on the Gripen tint while you’re at it? Report is very old now
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7VDthVsULa3a
Definetly need those tints ASAP, in SB the Typhoons HUD can be almost unusable under certain conditions
Thank you. The AV-8B+ reports looked to be dead since most were made a nearly a year ago but with nothing happening. But shouldn’t the other EEGS report be the duplicate since it was made 1 month after the one I linked? I know ultimately it doesn’t matter but still a bit weird.
But again thank you for giving those reports a bump.
Marketing truths
Once a report is forwarded that external report connects directly with the internally generated one. So whatever one gets forwarded is the “master” report so to speak. Anything else can only be attached as a duplicate.
Appears to already be forwarded. So nudged.
Would it be possible for you to nudge the Devs into adding the WT community 540lb bombs that are found on the Harrier GR.7 (and soon T.10) to other aircraft that currently carry the regular free fall 540lb (Bucc, Jag, Phantom)
You know they already have them right?
never mind, I get the wording now :D
Well played
Imagine the roles were reversed, Sweden got the MLU1 with JHMCS but the US got a late 90s one without JHMCS, would you expect people to be satisfied with ”there are distant plans for a better version, don’t worry”?
Sir. We are talking about the Harrier here not the Hornet.
Any chance this bug report regarding the D Apaches IRCM could be looked at? It’s present on the physical models but not actually a working module or in the new damage model. It weirdly exists on the A variants but none of the D variants.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WXr8oBjr9hGn
Sorry, I’m very tired, and annoyed, I think it’s time I log off and get some sleep
Same.
@Smin1080p_WT
Are Carriers getting back into top tier Air RB? i miss so much taking off and landing on them. now that we get the Hornet, are they making a return?
and can you also answer on why they where removed from top tier in the first place?
I do wonder if we will get carrier before Subs in naval, while subs have been tested I just dont see them being fun to play or fight with how slow they are