Does it perform correctly?
Have not tested it extensively yet after dev buff but the acceleration seems about correct.
I will compare to the E-M diagrams after it goes live.
It is severely limited in AOA however.
And ability to VIFF does not exist
viffing with av8c to get behind enemies mid-dogfight and then killing them with 9G is awesome
I agree except irl VIFF can allow the Harrier to slow down and change its pitch rate to an extraordinary degree.
In game it doesn’t do much.
Just wait till live lol the harriers at 9.7 will eat easy.
I hope we see a H-S Harrier T2 trainer in the future too at something like 9.3 without missiles, would be a cool CAS plane there imo ^^.
so by that logic, will the harrier T.10 go down to 11.0 in AirRB? they perform very similar with the Shar having the edge in a dogfight. and with everything mentioned in the T.10 being a worse AV8B(NA) in an air to air role
2 Likes
This is the point I am getting to.
1 Like
Ground attack capabilities still play some role in ARB BRs too. T.10 has significantly more strike capability than Shar.
be careful, itll be “no countermesures for balance reasons”
damn i hate thats even a feature. why are we using “no BOL” as a balance feature. Literally give the T.10 BOL and move it up in BR??? why are we not making stuff “accurate and by the doccuments” all of a sudden?
1 Like
Gr.3 can carry phimat and cvr7 rockets
1 Like
Im framing this and putting on my wall.
so this here is the REAL reason the tornados are all at differing BRs… what a joke
2 Likes
If strike capability plays a role in BR for ARB, could you also make it play a role in the gameplay itself?
1 Like
you can race mig21s with incendiary loadouts to bases dont you know!!!
you can shoot cannons at the light vehicles RIGHT where everyone fights (which the SHAR will do better as it has more ammo)
yeah im sure the T.10 will do better at ground strike in airRB…
This is not the case. We have explained in detail why the Tornados have different BRs. This is not it. These are different situations entirely.
Is there a plan to further buff the Harriers up to the E-M diagram.
As well as give the virtual instructor a reasonable AOA limit?
All reports will be reviewed. Outside of investigations into this, no changes are planned to the Harrier FMs.
@Smin1080p_WT Any chance you could give these reports a bump? They have been issues since they were first added several updates ago.
[DEV] AV-8B Plus missing locked target designation on HUD - This one has been reported since the AV-8B+ was added to the US during the Seek & Destroy update but has been an issue since it was added to Italy during Sons of Attila. It makes it much harder to know where the enemy is in Sim using the radar and AMRAAMs.
JHMCS missing radar symbology - This one affects pretty much all US made aircraft with HMDs. The F-16C/D, F-15C/E/J/J(M)/Baz M/I, and soon the F/A-18C Late. JHMCS should have radar symbology except it doesn’t in-game which makes tracking targets you have locked with radar much harder from cockpit view.
Eurofighter missing EEGS in Cockpit Sight / Head Up Display - This one has been an issue since the the Typhoon’s were added. The gunsight is stuck in the middle of the HUD and makes aiming whilst in cockpit view much harder.
Eurofighter HUD color Inaccuracy - With the Su-30SM and J-11B getting it’s HUD tint the Typhoon should also get it added too.
3 Likes
What about this suggestion. Fixes all the issues me and the community have with this addition.
I just want the cute harrier to be on par with the AV8B in at LEAST 1 role, and a tad bit closer to its IRL loadout
It’s still lacking around 1G
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0pjyC4bjkc9h
The virtual instructor limits AOA to a silly amount.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/GRvzP3u9zOXg
As we have already mentioned, the devs do not plan to add BOL in any capacity due to balance decisons. Harrier T.10 will have Phimat.