Idk either
I feel they are more or less an unconfirmed subtree at this point. I just need Denmark thrown in, pls snail i wish to reform the Kalmar Union for the King!!!
Norway and Gaijin (kinda) treating Sweden as the Nordic tech tree
I have Cantonese friends im just very aware of the canto feeling towards china and japan. I would love to see every country represented in WT but you’ve got to avoid sore points in a countries history and politics even when a game is non political it will just come across as insulting
fair enough. All in or nothing. Id prefer nothing so we don’t get commieslop C&P from india
2 Likes
Yeah, only hope we see a decent solution rather than a bad one.
Going by Quartas’ other comments, nothing.
So they shouldn’t have gotten it, according to his comments.
Tbf it would be way easier to just make a nordic TT with all of us rather than split us up for some unknown reason. I mean its sorta like Benelux.
Its our Norwegian bias.
Its a rly complex topic, but even if we ignore politics, a lot of the vehicles doesnt feel British and thats the issue.
Yup same.
Especially when there are interesting british export stuff yet to be added. including from India like
Sea Harrier
Jaguar
Gnat
Canberra
Hawk
And from South Africa like the Buc S50.
and if it ends up no where. Singapore Hunter would be awesome for us.
Why people want Soviet C&P when we have British export stuff that is far more appropriate and interesting is beyond me. Heck not even British export. Hawk, Jaguar GR3A, etc. Still missing
An CF-18 would be interesting for 12.7 and help bridge the gap between the F3 and F3 Late, but after that. I just want to see British stuff added for a good long while
Either have it as a skin for an existing vehicle or be mindful for once
At least one could come out every year, but gaijin didn’t do anything.
1 Like
with extra booster providing longer range than normal TY-90 in helis
Hell; even adding just ONE per major update, we would still have material for years.
And, again, that’s just MBTs- no SAMs included, which are highly needed as well, or LT/IFVs.
But its more important to add 8 top tier jets and C*S every update xD
It would be very nice if they did something with that report I did. At least based off the 16”/50 firing clock there’s a chance that US fast battleships could see a 2.5rpm, as the mounts are materially very similar for the 16”/45 and it is apparently the practice of the developers to subtract elevation time from reloads, which would knock off ~6 seconds. At least for the Iowa there’s no issue with shell supply either as an ordnance pamphlet quotes the hoists as being good for 3 shells/min/gun. The 16”/45 OP doesn’t spell it out exactly but the only major difference I saw reading through both was that the 16”/45 had pawls for 4 shells to be moved at once, while the 16”/50 had capacity for 5.
I mean they actually get modelled favourably by the Russian company that makes this game so there is a meta reasoning behind it
Yeah
Its really funny. What I want from air more than anything is new maps and a gamemode update, but they just add vehicles (no new SB map in 2.5 years)
What you really want is new ground vehicles but all they give is new maps/updated maps
3 Likes
Yeah, still annoying though.
1 Like