Definetly need those tints ASAP, in SB the Typhoons HUD can be almost unusable under certain conditions
Thank you. The AV-8B+ reports looked to be dead since most were made a nearly a year ago but with nothing happening. But shouldn’t the other EEGS report be the duplicate since it was made 1 month after the one I linked? I know ultimately it doesn’t matter but still a bit weird.
But again thank you for giving those reports a bump.
Marketing truths
Once a report is forwarded that external report connects directly with the internally generated one. So whatever one gets forwarded is the “master” report so to speak. Anything else can only be attached as a duplicate.
Appears to already be forwarded. So nudged.
3 Likes
Would it be possible for you to nudge the Devs into adding the WT community 540lb bombs that are found on the Harrier GR.7 (and soon T.10) to other aircraft that currently carry the regular free fall 540lb (Bucc, Jag, Phantom)
You know they already have them right?
never mind, I get the wording now :D
Well played
1 Like
Imagine the roles were reversed, Sweden got the MLU1 with JHMCS but the US got a late 90s one without JHMCS, would you expect people to be satisfied with ”there are distant plans for a better version, don’t worry”?
Sir. We are talking about the Harrier here not the Hornet.
Any chance this bug report regarding the D Apaches IRCM could be looked at? It’s present on the physical models but not actually a working module or in the new damage model. It weirdly exists on the A variants but none of the D variants.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WXr8oBjr9hGn
Sorry, I’m very tired, and annoyed, I think it’s time I log off and get some sleep
2 Likes
Same.
@Smin1080p_WT
Are Carriers getting back into top tier Air RB? i miss so much taking off and landing on them. now that we get the Hornet, are they making a return?
and can you also answer on why they where removed from top tier in the first place?
I do wonder if we will get carrier before Subs in naval, while subs have been tested I just dont see them being fun to play or fight with how slow they are
2 Likes
Mr community manager, can we please hear what the upper management has to say about decompression and/or shrinking the max br range of games? I am really curious about it.
2 Likes
Hi @Smin1080p_WT I know you’ve been answering to FIN F-18 stuff all day so I apologise for another question; BVVD said in the stream (based on Jean Clod’s translation) than an F18 (FIN) with CAS options will come NEXT update, was this a mistake? or did BVVD actually confirm this on stream? thanks a lot for the time.
You can lock a Harrier frontally with an AIM9L from beyond 5 km
Yet IRL from an encounter during the Falklands it’s not even possible to lock one frontally with AIM9L
1 Like
I’m famous lol
Having played a fair bit of Submarine simulations, mostly Cold Waters, making submarines work in naval (which I admittedly don’t really play) would be a bit of a challenge given how they’re meant to be used. It’s doable, I definitely get the appeal that subs have, but implementing them in a way that is fun and at least somewhat true to life would be a balancing nightmare. It’s very slow, methodical, and meant to be taken at a pace that I don’t think is really conducive to the game. If there was say, an EC mode for naval then it might fit better.
You’re probably gonna need to ask him again in an hour for an update.