I think it’s more a user interface issue, like for the same reason that many 4th gen aircraft have a WSO, the J-20S has one for data processing and tactical decisions as well as controlling wingman drones, which frees up the pilot to focus on just flying the aircraft
3 Likes
He’s really out to get me.
I’m going to vote no on a few of his suggestions.
Isn’t it Lightning II?
Since the American Lightning is the P-38
British Lightning is the English Electric one.
Britain also used the P-38, so that is one the English Electric is two and the F-35 is three
It’s usually not called the Lightning III though, just the F-35
The RAF would disagree with you though
But like I said the III isn’t used
5 Likes
Tom. Dick. Harry.
2 Likes
F4D-1 (early) (Pratt & Whitney J57-P-2 engine) to early rank VI before F3H-2
AIM-9B & AIM-7D ? I’m not sure
(F4H-1F) could be premium GE rank VI ?
F4U-2, F4U-4N, F4U-5 and F4U-5NL
Yeah just wanted to tell you nothing interesting has happened!
Don’t they have full crews?
Nope i’m wrong, im thinking about the B-1 Lancer
Whats the topic of the day RnR
Chinese flankers I think? and strategic bombers.
2 Likes
India’s 5th gen choices too, and why a French armoured car is using a German name
1 Like
Where Victor, Vulcan and BAC TSR-2?
1 Like
Post naming standardization. Yes. Prestandardization no.
Official name of A-10 Thunderbolt II, official name of F-35 Lighting II.
If the Strategic Bomber tree/line also includes maritime patrol aircraft, that opens up quite a few possibilities for nations that wouldn’t have access to actual strategic bombers.
Also… why would they need a separate line or page? Most nations have a heavy bomber tree already, just fit them in there?
1 Like
Can’t forget the LefH 18B2.
9 Likes