Yeah but not a 37.
I did the research for the original m4 prototype suggestion on the old forum. The first m4 was literally an m3 with a new superstructure.
(I should redo that suggestion before the old forums get yoinked)
It is very aerodynamical
Also, what other fighter can carry 8 amraam with a full 20,000+ lb a2g payload?
That would be correct. If its not about a vehicle announced, there is nothing to add at the moment in time.
2 Likes
That doesn’t change the “M4” never having a 37.
yeah… wait… oh my god its prototype did
Speaking of ridiculous payloads, can i haz b1?
Two Typhoons strapped together?
Any chance the R13M1 will be added to the J35XS with the next update since it was passed for consideration over a year ago?
Or the armor holes on the MK.IV with the new update?
1 Like
it was the other way around it was the known m4a1 hull with a m3 lee turret
Technically not iirc. But there was a wooden mockup of it. And another wooden mockup with like 3 37mm in the same turret or something like that.
okay, thought I would ask
The first sherman (t6 pilot) was a lee hull with everything above the running gear cut off and replaced.
So your saying It takes 2 fighters jets made with the collective expertise of a good chunk of western Europe to match 1 American fighter
the 3*37 your thinking of was a full prototype for an spaa
looks like it was a 37-40mm and 2 .50
3 Likes
That fine all i want is ask and as many thing in game now that only in trials but stil get in to game. :v
That excel look terrible. Literally same mistake Wows did. Papper ship montana vs Yamato… While Super Yamato as paper as montana Its forgotten.
hope for T-84T and VT-4 soon lol
or you know, the J-10As bomb count which got approved in DoD
or the AGMs for the J-10A that got approved in DoD
Montanna was begun actually it just didn’t get very far