I think hes more upset about why Sweden got a trial T80 U, Mi-28, and AHS they shouldn’t have been given
2 Likes
He’s wrong, but so are you in this case. The F4Js where a later purchase to complement the licensed produced F-4M & Ks. The F-4J’s where leased to fill a gap created by the enlarging of the RAF presence in the Falklands post war, whilst a suitable Phantom replacement was in the works. F-15s where considered but in the end F-4S was considered the best bang for the buck, however due to lack of available airframes F-4Js where provided at a lower cost that originally agreed.
What will it become next? Panther of the plane?
oh no, he’s learning to swim!
1 Like
At least it’s fast enough to give the amraams range, making it excel at something.
I know I like to meme on the Hornets, but it really feel like instead of being good at at least 1 thing, they just look/feel mid at everything.
1 Like
Leopard of the lagoon.
Bruh I quoted War Thunder directly, and actually, we did give thema license to modify/make parts for them
F-15 is not brick. 12 missiles standard, with very good radar and rwr. Export one have maws
These have all been explained many times in the past. It has no relation to the DF-105/AMD or this topic at all.
2 Likes
I’m obviously not contesting the pictures. There’s even a receipt of the purchase. That’s not what a trial is then. Just a simple correction.
:shrug: it’s kinda what they’re designed for, not enough room on carriers for specialists, so a master of one can be a detriment to the overall air power of the carrier
2 Likes
Don’t think so only flytest in US from what i know in Thailand news
pretty sure that was the intended design profile, a jack of all trades to simplify naval operations and logistics
4 Likes
then they didnt operate them and didnt take ownership of them
1 Like
Most would argue that driving or inspecting it is proof enough, i just dont care enough about the specifics, it never arrived and has equally the same amount of reason as any other trial vehicle imo.
Im more interested in thai ground actually
While they are literally the same chassis the M4 is not an M3 and the M4 didn’t have an 37mm.
Will there be a similar policy in the future for similar equipment?
f15 is NOT a brick
F-15 is such a brick, like the whole design is just a rectangle with bits sticking out