So 3 simple points, Russian bias, too much premiums and selective realism
But subtrees are no excuse to stop putting efford into the game tbh
For gaijin its an excuse
1 Like
Simple but game breaking imo
you could put it like that but your missing a few there
That is definitely a hot take since Japan has a lot of prop planes that are actually unique and fun to use, same as their unique variants of WW2 and modern vehicles. Sweden is also another one that should have been in the game due to the varieties.
1 Like
Not as OP as before now. Those SPAA are getting realy good aswell…
what modes cause every mode has been asked for
Read from here.
1 Like
thing with Japan specifically is that they didnt had to rely on it until post ww2 vehicles were added
and in the early days it was said that “there will never be jets added to WT”
1 Like
And Gaijin decided to use subtrees for copy-paste.
2 Likes
Real too
X branch (like Aviation or Ground or whatever) just shouldn’t be added of Y nation when there is not enough without copypasting. Having some nation be purely (e.g.) Aviation really wouldn’t kill the game
Because surprise surprise, subtrees are made of nations that tend to buy from other countries since they either have very low or no home grown products to use.
2 Likes
infantry.
not needed
probably costing them a lot
bad implementation of it
i mean dagor engine (which is what gaijin uses for the game) struggle to support human movement
etc
Japan only ‘relies’ on subtree stuff because the game went ~50 years past its original timeframe
2 Likes
Yes. And those vehicles don’t need to be added when there are better alternatives.
Hence its a Gaijin issue not a player or subtree issue.
closer to 60 years a this point
And theres the issue again where the community becomes the problem. We all asked for modern slop so we are a part of this
2 Likes
That is still not a good way to do it, again, Japan offers a good variety of different WW2 and modern vehicles, the issue has always stemmed from the inability to make line ups in Ground battles. So I do not agree with your take in any capacity at all.
1 Like