how naive
more views dosent mean that more ppl saw the videos
there are probably quite some ppl that watched all of those videos, which means that not every view on those videos is a unique viewer
there is a pretty big overlap between the WT creators
Kh38mt being a paper weapon
Selectiv Realism
We dont give that as a weapon couse it was never used it in service but Rafale has 8 misiles…
It only used 6 in service never 8
Premium Proplem…
Overperforming rusian vehicles bmpt kh38 lmur
Pmpt etc
And so much more its insane
List them then
True peak
List all of them so we can look what true and what false.
thats not how views work if its the same people watching the videos
Copy and paste proplem too
Clear rusian bias
Volumetric armor proplems
Abrams chally merkava wrong armor proplem
Gaijin is making things up for top tier ww2 and viatnam timeline vehicles are good ingame and realistic because the documents are easy to get and not restricted but good luck finding things for modern jets and tanks.
They have a few stats to work with and the rest is just making performance up.
And there is no other way tbh.
But that is selectiv realism
The points can be true but it does nothing except just being slop cuz one person called it out so now everyone joins in. My question to these CCs would be, “Where were you guys when the community needed the most and why is it only NOW that you guys are complaining about it when these has been a growing issue half a decade ago?”
It’s just slop and attention spamming.
What is the copy and paste problem?
Its not now
People like spooksten started like 5 years ago
didnt know he is jewish
quite a bunch of those in the game
one of the more recent additions would be the XF5U
this is probably about the F-14D not getting the AMRAAM/ AIM-7P, both of which it physically cant use so gaijin wont give it to it under “technically being compatible” becasue they arent
unlike the Rafale which tested the 8 missile loadout for the export customers
or the Swiss hornets which are identical to the US ones with the only thing being that Switzerland never bought A2G munitions
that is the right and only possible way
but its a problem…
Ok and that’s just one guy out of 500 other CCs, that’s my point. One content creator made noise 5 years ago and not even anyone else hopped on other than maybe 2 or 3 others. Now we fast forward to few days ago, one person made noise again and suddenly everyone’s in on it?
Low efford like gooner chally ai slop
Fast money making strategie
Also why has france 3 leos ?
In a few years ecery tech tree looks the same
no , it flew in real life, the kh38mt exist but just an export prototype
yes because they realized that it now brings quite a bit of clicks
But the kh38 is OP
People think its good to only need to grind 1 tree to have X nations collection of vehicles. But its a big issue because what point is there in replayability when 1 nation is doomed to have every other nations vehicle at one point or another
premiums becoming more and more focused every update
vehicle implementations getting lazier
Russian equipment getting special treatment
AI usage
poring money into modes people didnt ask for when the game is in a bad state as it is
the selective realism
the double standard on bug reports
the severe game imbalance
the expectations and needs for bug reports
the copy and paste issue
the “russian bias” problem as a whole (the KH38MT being a paper weapon the BMPT the SM-SV etc)
im probably missing quite a lot but still