I watched the whole video now. It has a couple of good points, but also quite a bit of stuff I don’t agree with. Especially the unification part to a certain extend.
half the things he said where absolute nonsense
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Pulling up stats doesnt make you correct. You have no proof of your claims
Now prove they are still in the game in regular matches
You have only but to watch the replays!!! Already proved you wrong thus far!
1 Like
is it me or most of he’s answers feel like AI?
1 Like
What replays? Post some
Anyone you feel the urge to watch!! Garaunteed in your matches aswell!!! Not difficult to spot!
Heck - Naval is plagued with them!
1 Like
If its so obvious, you should be able to post a replay and point out a specific player is a bot. You should also have some proof that they “target specific players” like you claim. It sounds to me like you just cant accept the fact that some players are better than you
This part is true at least
Firstly your assumption that cant accept is rather humorous and quite pathetic. Ofcourse there are a lot of players better than I, but Im also better than alot of others.! Swings and roundabouts on that one Bubble!
So you already agree there are Bots, you know there are and yet you still argue there arent in any other battles.!! I mean if ignorance is a fact by your own words.! !
I never said there arent any, they just arent as common as you claim and they dont target specific players. They are also entirely unrelated to the bots made by gaijin that used to be in the game
You’re not providing proof that game controlled bots exist outside of naval which is the whole conversation here so idk what point you’re trying to make either way. We know naval has game controlled bots and we can see that by right clicking bot-like usernames to find out you can’t.
On the contrary, in air and ground, you can right click a bot-like username to find out it’s a real player. How real it is comes down to whether this is a malicious account created purely to be sold or just another idiot that don’t know how to play the game.
I’m still waiting for you to prove your own point.
4 Likes
Have you considered lowering the ground battle BR of the F-16I, or equipping it with a richer weapon loadout? It’s pretty obvious that it’s about to be completely inferior to the F-16CM, whether it’s ground weapons, air-to-air weapons, or radar.
I won’t even mention things like the Su-30SM(2), Typhoon, or Rafale anymore; those planes can outperform the F-16I in every way even with their eyes closed.
1 Like
3" Howitzer wouldn’t be useless with the HEAT round. 75mm of penetration at 30 degrees and roughly 86.6mm at 0 degrees, at all ranges. So better performance than 2-Pdr APCBC.
they can give it everything at had(execpt for python4/5) and wont break the game:( the amount of neglect it gets is criminal
For example, the innermost hardpoint on an F-16 can carry a quadruple bomb rack, mounting something like a GBU-39 or SPICE 250. There’s plenty of evidence (photos) showing this can be done, and doing so won’t mess up the so-called ‘balance’ because the JAS 39E can already carry 16 SPICE 250s.
I’m not even going to bring up why the F-16I doesn’t have any SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) loadout; Israel’s only anti-radiation weapon is on the F-16C (almost nobody uses it, whether in ground or air combat).
1 Like