Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

i think its less people are blinded by hatred and more your just trying to ignore the bad stuff about it

what about the boxes in wt where you spend like 500ge to buy then another 100ge for a key?

its a lot easier to do that when theyre mostly made up

i disagree, imo its pretty subjective, sure its sad we only got the roadmap for that one time and not anymore, the lack of visibility is pretty sad. but gaijin is moving more to adding non-unique premiums which is good as really premiums should only be a tool for grinding a tree with, i personally like a lot of the recent UI changes too

eh I have yet to experience it unless it’s a bug that effect all like the on the dev when asm broke the servers

I ignore them cause nothing I want others who knows, but also they come back the ones in WoWs takes a whole life time to come back and it’s a choice that you can make for a later time unlike WoWs where if you miss it you miss it oh well

The WOT:HEAT game seems way to fantasy for my taste. Even in the current botched state WT still clears.

2 Likes

gaijin dont fully hide some vehicles behind their lootboxes bro, for WG games its often the only way to access that vehicle

They moved the pins into the holes that you can see in the mantlet which buffed its armour value up to what it realistically should be but in gaijins mind the Trunions actually should have massive holes in them because the pins aren’t inserted all of the way lol

no basically they are trying to say that they had no way to test L27A1s anti ERA tip against kontakt 5 when the UK literally purchased a T80U a year earlier for the exact reason

The challenger 2s have the worst mobility, the worst shell and now the worst survivability. They already had bag charges in the hull but if the enemy messed up their shot it could have missed and not hit them, now any messed up shot that doesn’t hit the bag charges instead hits a module that leaves the tank good as dead

it took the community to tell them not to add the F-16 though even I know that was a bad call

oh i see, i didnt even notice that, so the weakpoint just got moved lol

i dont believe that is what gaijin are saying anymore

Spoiler

image

them listening to the community at all is a massive improvement over WG

yeah but that’s only happen 3 times that I have seen it does need to be more Like I want more F-14 I wouldn’t mind an F-14D with the planned upgrade as a squadron vic plus the F-14AU as a TT that is Folder with the other 14s

basically “our team thinks the first hand source is wrong”

still falls under the excuse of personal opinion, but at this point with gaijin ive learned once they have their mind set in stone about something it will never change

sorry if you want more ‘copypaste’ you have to singlehandedly get all the silly people to stop complaining about it first /s

or open peoples eyes that their better ways to go about things but hey I’m one guy what more can I do

no as i see it its more, “we literally have no clue how theyre doing this so we’re gonna assume they arent till we find out more, but also we arent gonna do the research thats up to you:”

like I said, hopefully its good news from the current debacle might get some of this stuff solved but its probably hopium

Also a pseudo R-37. I doubt it’ll ever achieve Mach 5 (or anywhere near its stated max speed; but happy to be proven wrong) in a normal match, but still.

you have far more faith in gaijin then I do lol

I fully expect to see no change to L27A1, I also fully expect gaijin to completely leave the UK with no ARMs below 12.7 when we have literally a half dozen of options between 12.7 and 10.7

(which wouldnt require new ARMs and just the ALARM)

1 Like

R-37M sneak peek

that happens a lot, its just sad assuming the worst will happen all the time.
but people act like gaijin is some despicable giant with an agenda, but theyre just not, the only real problem is their standards for information are really high (which isnt always a problem) and when they have to make an assumption they make the minimum possible assumption

idk if it can still lock aircraft radars, cause i know they removed that from some ARMs, but when i was playing on the dev server that thing was a menace to any who didnt realise what it was

very rambly

but yeah i dont really get why gaijin is so afraid about putting ARMs at lower BRs than they have, I dont really think agm45s would be a problem even down to like 10.7, they just fear that all the free spaa players wont know how to turn their radars off i think but i feel 3-4 alarms on the gr1 and even putting it to 11.7 would be fine

I’ve gone from WoT to WoWs to WT, and in my experience Wargaming is definitely the greedier of the two companies, with blatant gambling that I’m quite frankly surprised ever passed my countries (The Netherlands) gambling laws.

However, that being said, Wargaming is the better company of the two when it comes to rewarding player retention, rather then rewarding player growth.
The fact you can get several premium vehicles for free per year (and not freemium, but genuinely just premiums you’re gifted for logging in or your account being a certain age) is something that that company does far better then Gaijin.
Because what does Gaijin think is a valid reward for logging in ever single day of the year for years on end? A Decal.

6 Likes

the bigger divisions of WG are at least, blitz is allergic to that kinda stuff apart from maybe a tier 2 or 3 for christmas but basically nobody plays blitz anymore so who cares ig