once again, thats not what i asked… let me try and rephrade but i havent slept so mind my stupidity
these modules are scheduled correct? if so in the time before these modules get worked on and implemented more focus should be shifted towards these seperate reports to buff the tank as you and the devs know how much these modules affect there performance
im not saying the modules and bug reports are connected im saying focus should be shifted in the mean time to balance things out between the modules and maaking the tank more realistic in ways that make it better, a simple focus shift before modules are added so the tanks performance is still decent because we both know the challengers performance after this update and usability is gone.
for example, while before the module stuff happens the devs probably had time to implement
spall liners
ready rack
armour buffs
L27A1 buffs which COULD HAVE BEEN THIS UPDATE but the report was made as clear marketing lie when there was more proof of l27a1s anti era performance than there is of the KH38MT existence and that goes for DM53 aswell.
Ive understood you each time. Im afriad thats the answer I have been giving. The modules are independent from any reports, the same as they have been from all other tanks that previously got them.
Its not the case that the addition of these modules means X report will be resolved. They are different entirety. Just as it was for the Leopard, Leclerc, Abrams and Type 10 too.
They are getting the one many asked for (AIM) for a long time and the SEP as a bonus on top of that. Im not really sure why it was expected it would be the “best” Abrams.
and my point/suggestion goes for all of those tanks to. you know the modules affect the tanks performance a lot and theres a lot of old bug reports sitting there collecting dust that could be worked on for when that happens weather there connected to the modules or not (which i know there not) but if there gonna implement something that hinders the tanks performance regardless of how its scheduled the old reports should be looked back on and focused on so the tank doesnt become terrible and useless
2 greaat tanks however please say the AIM is gonna get its fender flare things above the tracks it looks disgusting, but britain went from having 5 decent tanks on its top tier lineup to 2 good tanks which isnt a great trade imo also i didnt say i expected it to be the best but not the worst considering its supposed to be a sepv3 and is just a downgrade to a sepv2 but hey i also got suggestions there your welcome
the hull armour buff for the SEPV3
and KEW-A2 for the AIM as there the only abrams at 12.0 with less than 600mm of pen