Ive understood you each time. Im afriad thats the answer I have been giving. The modules are independent from any reports, the same as they have been from all other tanks that previously got them.
Its not the case that the addition of these modules means X report will be resolved. They are different entirety. Just as it was for the Leopard, Leclerc, Abrams and Type 10 too.
They are getting the one many asked for (AIM) for a long time and the SEP as a bonus on top of that. Im not really sure why it was expected it would be the “best” Abrams.
and my point/suggestion goes for all of those tanks to. you know the modules affect the tanks performance a lot and theres a lot of old bug reports sitting there collecting dust that could be worked on for when that happens weather there connected to the modules or not (which i know there not) but if there gonna implement something that hinders the tanks performance regardless of how its scheduled the old reports should be looked back on and focused on so the tank doesnt become terrible and useless
2 greaat tanks however please say the AIM is gonna get its fender flare things above the tracks it looks disgusting, but britain went from having 5 decent tanks on its top tier lineup to 2 good tanks which isnt a great trade imo also i didnt say i expected it to be the best but not the worst considering its supposed to be a sepv3 and is just a downgrade to a sepv2 but hey i also got suggestions there your welcome
the hull armour buff for the SEPV3
and KEW-A2 for the AIM as there the only abrams at 12.0 with less than 600mm of pen
this year?? no by the end of this dev server lmao. every NATO MBT has gotten filled to the brim with turret baskets, fcs, power systems?? and for some reason driver controls, but russian MBTS are still mostly empty lol