Pretty sure this is the helicopter at the start of the Thing when the Norwegians are tracking the dog
Idk though looks similar
L39 is FM is too bad, I wondering how it could only take 4 zuni pods and then the SL is about 530km/h?
And also due to the rocket launch issue still hasn’t been fixed, I really doubt its performances
@Smin1080p_WT Is there any plans for gaijin to allow the F-16s equipped with PIDS to be able to carry AIM-9s, AIM-120s, and AGM-65s on said pylons? This has been accepted for nearly two years and now with more and more F-16s having PIDS it really should be avaliable.
1 Like
Looks like we will have another Colian at 7.7 XD
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gbPUWDU5HrJ9
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9nvwZ5ibssXr
So uhhh… where is the arjun mbt ? Or the su15, or even f16xl…
I eated them
You eat a lot of things huh
Kinda
perhaps today will make me happy
the rest of indonesia will be coming in next dev update, confirmed by bvvd’s inner left nose hair because it twitched the word “indonesian sub tree tomorrow” in morse code.
4 Likes
In his right nose his hair tells us that the Aussie KF 41 coming for Britain !
Link the report, it’s also not clear which F-16 you mean
F-16 w/ PIDS would be the F-16AMs + PoBIT / V iirc
There is only one F-16 that has the standard PIDS or PIDSU in War Thunder currently. That is the Belgian F-16A:
IRL image of a PIDS and a maverick on a F-16AM block 15 MLU:
However the report that was accepted wrongfully says the PIDS+ can use A-2-A armaments, or at least uses the wrong PIDS image to prove as such (a PIDS instead of the PIDS+):
The F-16AM block 15 MLU cant use MAW/flare pods with missiles
The F-16AM’s (Norway, Belgium) have the PIDS+, same as the F-16CM PoBIT:
PIDS and variants chart:
Related post:
To be honest I get that it’s unfair, but I already tired of getting angry on this game. I just accept it as minor/japan nation tax, at least that way I don’t have to monitor my blood pressure.
I hope the next update (not the one coming) is only variants.
I want to watch WT Reddit and YouTube burn because people can’t read a wiki page or a history book. Or understand that a vehicle having a different look at a glance means it’s not a 1-1 vehicle like they all think it is.
7 Likes
yeah, the 1A5BE discourse has been depressing to read to be completely honest. I would hate to see the community discourse around a Leopard 1A3, AMX-13-105, or hell the (probably) upcoming Sabre event…
5 Likes
Indeed, this meme weekend hasn’t helped, but I was already growing to relizse these people will call the most unique vehicle in the world C&P just because a BeNeLux nation used it.
There was a post where you could see the 1A5BE and 1A5 next to each other, and you didn’t need to spend any brain power to tell it’s not pure C&P, and a post saying an AMX-30 with a stabilizer would be unique, yet the 1A5BE isn’t, makes me realize how hypocritical they are.
If other nations were held to BeNeLux standards, for this update the SEPv3 is C&P (after all, it’s another Abrams), or every welded hull Sherman with a 75mm gun is C&P (doesn’t matter one is 4.0, same hull type, same gun and same family = C&P to them).
6 Likes
I love that the Aussie abrams or Thai L-39 aren’t copy paste but a unique 1A5 variant is?
Tbf Im pretty sure people called the Italian 1A2 copy paste too
7 Likes