Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

[PantherBait]

Except we do this and it still gets denied. Which contradicts their 2021 post saying they understood they had to estimate some stuff for modern vehicles due to the classified nature of most the literature.

[PantherBait]

Or biased. Might just be that.

[el_Argentino]

@Jabber7625

why is this red

Rosita is hot?

[The_Holy_Duck]

[The_Holy_Duck]

i like that they just ignore half of all the bug reports

[Chocolate_Pasta]

@Smin1080p_WT
Can we expect to fix such a “common issue” ? which has existed for 4 years and noted. However, seems Gaijin still hasn’t fixed due to some tech issue.

I believe that has already impacted most of the planes in this game; however, the last report is marked as dup.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/B5p6akdDbkN0
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CrNzZdpQQXTk

[Code_649]

@Morvran_

Whilst im finding the situation personally a little bit funny. I do actually get the complaint.

So far France has gotten an F-16 in the TT, an F-16 as an SQV, an F-16 as their event aircraft and now as their premium. In fairly rapid succession.

It seems as if the ONLY vehicle gaijin has ever considered for France in the past 6 months? is the F-16, an aircraft not actually operated by France.

Out of all the things they could have picked. The F-16 is one of the more boring ones. I think French mains would have been happier with a Mirage IIIE or something else at or around that BR as a premium over another F-16 at high BR.

I wouldn’t mind a C&P Mirage 4000 premium 🙂‍↕️

[AblativeKitten]

:pray: Indonesian ground tomorrow :pray:

[RSS_Defender]

Day 9

of asking gaijin to not split my country (Singapore)

[Deathmisser]

Day 4 for asking the Aussie Kf 41 for Britain

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

@skittiee

and the shell is booty

what?
M829A3 is the second best tech tree shell in the game

What the hell are you on about here

[MiGoon_Fox-3]

Why would USA need another MBT?
They already have what? 10 top-tier equivalant abrams tanks

[efetenekeci]

Russia got a few useless arena-equipped vehicles. Instead they could have got T-80UM series vehicles or some prototypes.

[_Renzo]

Common trend between the new MBTs added to both Russia and US this update is that all of them are either sidegrade or doengrades over existing models.

(For real though, who in their right mind complains about a freaking T-90M being added. It’s nothing special)

[THEPolishThunder]

Day 1202 of waiting for the Polish tech tree

[Jabber7625]

because the hull armor on them is bad, NATO specifically america ground iirc has one of the lowest win rates at above 10.7

[_Renzo]

@Jabber7625

NATO specifically america ground iirc has one of the lowest win rates at above 10.7

Which is still for a large part because of Russian CAS, BMPT and major nation players.

All the Abrams in game can be categorized either as good, really good or downright stupidly undertiered.

[Homeless_Soldier]

the lower tier abrams are good
IPM1 and M1 Abrams are very solid

They start to struggle a bit with the M1A1 and M1A2 where the whole tank is just a huge weakspot…
the tank is solid both mobility wise and firepower wise
but it feels like playing an overweight light tank playstyle wise-

I could see the M1 Abrams being 11.0 if they go through with the armor changes done on the M1A1

[_Renzo]

@Homeless_Soldier

but it feels like playing an overweight light tank playstyle wise-

I mean most of the Abrams are also incredible brawlers.

[skittiee]

i mean compared to IRL… thats what i am on about here.