Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Just so you know, it seems the top one can use both LK and LD charges, so you need more than just launcher shape to confirm what type it is.

pls no ( except if it replace the Eitan in the TT that has the bad Iron Fist)

Merkava Mk.4A (APS) (Squadron) soon:tm: )))

1 Like

I get your point. But it’s quite odd to put LD charges in LK luncher. LK charges are a bit bigger, so putting LD in it is wired choice, but possible, I guess. What is for sure you cannot do vice versa.

merkava mk 4a with iron fist would be an amazing addition. should have been added instead of this useless thing.
image
which, btw, doesnt even exist irl

1 Like

Why not?

We’ve had other nations decals that had no vehicles at all in game or 1-2.

Did we will get dev update today?

Anything new on the PL-12 stuff as its been over 1 month, i think?

Only one aircraft for now, but there is many they could add in the future

1 Like

How so may i ask? Btw thanks to the answer at my request :)

i wonder if there are any planes to make the HARM pods have a function such as letting you see enemy radar bands

I mean, dunno. For example CV 90 has the same launchers, but it is LD.

Obviously because Indonesia air tree is next /j

2 Likes

because it is just a mix of kits being added to the mk4b and it doesnt even have batash plates

1 Like

Do you feel similarly for a certain Advanced Tactical Fighter?

Hmmm, no dev update today, it seems?

While true, it is fielded by only one country. I think the expo demonstrator would be more appropriate.

1 Like

actually we bought our BWP from Czechoslovakia, but it will go the Polish tech tree

2 Likes

MiG-29K R-77-1 buff when? Half joking here but it’s interesting to know that every MiG carrying R-77 is also capable of carrying R-77-1.

IMO, MiG-29SMT/MiG-29M keeping the normal R-77 is fine, gotta keep a healthy amount of 13.7 aircraft and especially to complement the Su-27SM as an alternative (like how F-16C and F-15C MSIP II complements each other at 13.7), but USSR has no 14.0 aircraft at all. A 6 R-77-1 MiG-29K would’ve filled that “void” nicely and the later MiG-35 could maybe have R-77M alongside the Su-35 to keep them separate* when the next Great Decompression happens

*

YAP INCOMING:

Using the Gripen C as an example, it’s obviously compatible with Meteor missiles but Gaijin likely won’t give it those to maintain its position as an “early” Gripen in the Swedish/other TTs

Likewise, giving a select number of aircraft new gen missiles (for USSR this could be Su-30SM2 and in a future update, Su-35S and MiG-35) that are essentially the same bar a few internal upgrades (cough, AESAphoons) and not every possible jet (pending considerations) would keep things balanced BR wise and not put a gaping hole in several trees (shouldn’t be a problem long term… sub trees and other domestic vehicles are still pending over in the suggestions area)

2 Likes

no the 29M isnt