Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

To make a correction, while Soviet MBTs also had an FCS, as far as I know, they didn’t have mechanics where the NVD gets disabled, like you see with the FCS on the Abrams’ gun mantlet.

Sea Eagle in game
Harpoon next patch
KH next patch
YJ-83 in game
Kormoran in game

I don’t want to be that guy, but now would be a really good time for Exocet to finally exist in the game instead of just sitting in the files

4 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT is exocet being added yet before the dev closes? Pretty please with a cherry on top

1 Like

Falklands moment. (I cannot wait for Falklands to be put in a nuclear thunder sized map, imagine the community custom events!).

4 Likes

wouldn’t that mostly just end up being ocean with all ground targets and bases being protected by a net of Buk/Pantsirs/S-300s?

I’m pretty sure he already denied them unfortunately

Though they were modified recently, as one datamine showed

Exocet and RBS 15 would be peak

1 Like

so ALARMs are finally PRH yet still no sign of them being on the GR1 or any other aircraft yet

3 Likes

Hi @Smin1080p_WT Could the developers please take another look at this bug report? It has been two years since this bug report was approved, and the fact that this issue has not been fixed is contributing to the weakening of Belgium’s F-16AMs.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/KnIyNirQXpAX

I would prefer the M-346 to lose it’s ARH missiles if it meant it could go to a lower BR where it would be more competitive. I was thinking 12.0 with 4x AIM-9M would be a good spot for it.

I’m surprised you even had faith in them to begin with to get this stuff right. This is why me and many people were against more complex modules change sparked by the 2s38. People were cheering but many of us knew this shit would bite us back in the ass no too long later with absolutely no benefit to the fun factor or skill floor with how gaijin goes about things

1 Like

btw is mitl for fixed wing just literally unusable for just me or is the camera aving a seizure for all of us

The maximum speed listed in the technical specifications does not reflect actual in-flight performance.

For example, the Kh-58U is listed in the specifications as having a maximum speed of Mach 4.5, but in flight simulations it cannot exceed Mach 1.8 (use an online unit converter to calculate).

Similarly, the Kh-31P and YJ-91 are listed in the statistics as Mach 4.5, but in reality, they do not exceed Mach 2.9.

Other missiles from various countries have the same problem.

@Smin1080p_WT Could you tell us if this will be corrected or if it will remain as is, given that the missiles reach the speed mentioned above but never achieve their full speed potential?

Analysis after original data unpacking

I searched several Indonesian media about the purchase of J10 fighter jets from China, several sources said this would be a J10B but would get a significant upgrade to the avionics (Maybe an AESA radar and can carry PL 15E too. Perhaps the turbofan engine also uses an original Chinese engine), this configuration is done to equalize the performance of the Rafale EI/DI F4.1 (The Rafale C/B export variant is specifically for Indonesia). Several Indonesian media sources say this configuration will be known as the J10B+. But there are also some Indonesian media who say they will buy J10B without any upgrades at all (Tbh Indonesia bought J10B used by PLAAF and some sources say only B variant that available and ready to send). However, it is true that there are also several sources that say that Indonesia purchased the J10C/CE, For the J10CE, I’m not so sure because of course this is a new plane (I mean this is new production aircraft and not a used aircraft that’s ready to be sent…because Indonesia itself might be in a state of dire need of this aircraft as soon as possible and the ex-PLAAF J10 is the solution for that). But on the one hand, I’m not sure that China will give Indonesia used J10Cs…

Day 14 getting Gaijin to listen to suggestions and not splitting SG up everywhere.

8 Likes

Day 7 of asking gaijin to not split my country (Singapore)
851ad1e472e329b3dcdeefef4fc26b71

2 Likes

It’s more like frame generation hallucinates and makes you see things that don’t happen

1 Like

Singapore is pretty much impossible as a standalone tech tree in the game. I remember Gaijin planned to add Singapore as a subtree under China, but the forum went absolutely crazy, everyone was yelling and opposing it. So Gaijin had to break up the Singapore tree and scatter those vehicles across different nations. I also recall that after that, Chinese players on the forum learned to speak up and stand up for their rights.

3 Likes

I’m not asking for a singular tech tree because I know its not possible, I am asking for everything to be placed with Israel because it is the most logical. China is not a logical nation.

They can sit down and protest for their own rights but it doesn’t change the fact it is not a logical place for our stuff to go there.

9 Likes