this update is turning out pretty terrible for the uk so far
also now that the B and D got 9M will A get 9Ls?
2 Likes
I will take the 75mm APHE for the Excelsior. Not like I will play top tier anytime soon
so on the new CR2 there now now power systems in the floor next to the driver as well as next to the engine and another at the side. its only on the new one
the ONLY plus so far for the UK is the addition of ALARM and even that has issues, because GR.1 isn’t getting them when it very well should be.
2 Likes
Is this missing a comma? I cant understand if F-16AM will get its preorder or no
he said no
yep, they just made a struggling MBT to a unplayable one this update…
they changed the mantlet yesterday, from a more correct mantlet, to an incorrect mantlet
Current dev
1st Dev
Live Server
Live server misses the entire pins
1st Dev includes the pins
Current dev only has the outside part of the pins (now tell me how the hell they connect to the rest of it gaijin if there is no part of the pin inside)
2 Likes
when did the M-346FA get moved its under the ADV
The developers have stated that it previously wasn’t final, but now is:
“The holes were sealed incorrectly. The current version, where the pins only take up about a third of the hole, is correct and final.”
so a nerf to the breech armour a power system a turret basket and an fcs? what the hell are you guys trying to do to the challengers they might as well just be removed at this point
10 Likes
This was expected. Best MiG-29 is still non researchable for all.
I think all those Russian bias accusations are addressed by punching 90s Russian prototypes/ideas in the face.
This must get R-77-1s btw. I don’t think 9.41 ever mounted a R-77 basic.
1 Like
as stated it got reported that it was not able to carry 8 of them
Since the dev server appears to still be quite unfinished, can we expect it to be prolonged? It will end tomorrow at 7 UTC
As if AIM-9M itself was the reason people requested a TT F-14D. There are tens of reasons more.
2 Likes
I dont mean any disrespect here but it does feel somewhat like those of us who genuinely enjoy playing challengers are being forced into other tanks, if thats the case why add those abrams at all since the price of it is the removal of pretty much any utility the cr2s had
1 Like
so this is now the damage area which ill take out the gun
they also added driver controls that can be taken out
1 Like
Hi @Smin1080p_WT , what are these pins meant to be representing exactly?
Without being connected to the trunnion they arent able to serve the purpose of rotor/trunnion pins?
Additionally, why model holes in the trunnion if nothing fills them? Its very obvious that the pins have to enter the trunnion to provide support, and the holes in the trunnion are there for the pins to fit within?
Additionally, with the complex part modelling challenger 2 is recieving, does that mean it may recieve its other missing parts in detail, like the missing spall lining in the hull?
3 Likes
Every positive change made to the challengers in the dev server has seemingly been reverted.
not just this dev server, but dev servers before it.
The turret basket for one is wild considering the evidence against it.
The trunnion being “somewhat correct” to now being completely incorrect and “final” is another example of it.
We are here fighting to get this thing correct. If its not the L27a1 not getting ERA properties, it’s literally anything to do with the armour. The vehicle doesn’t even have its full hull spawl liners, and there are bugs for the vehicle that have been reported for 2+ years without fixes.
3 Likes