The cheeks that maybe hold up to half a ton. This is just getting more ridiculous and we will most likely see “because no info” from Smin. Yeah sure and totally not the pretty damn detailed report explaining it all
I wish they brang back being able to cap zones with aircraft
All for two not 150 mm plates, what a joke
At least they have yet to call the Anti-ERA on the A3 shell a marketing lie like they have done so for L27A1 and DM53
What day is it today?
There has been ZERO communication on any of the threads on this matter either
3 Likes
It’s day 1197
1 Like
They know EXACTLY what they are doing, but speak out about it too much you get silenced
Weren’t both shells made exactly for the purpose to defeat Kontakt
1 Like
Still just am37 for france?
Yup!
L27A1 was even developed by firing at a T-80U, Primary docs confirm it can pen the UFP with the ERA.
Gaijin doesnt beleive the tests occured when Britain had said T-80U, despite the tests occuring a year after acquistion
6 Likes
150? Not, not 150, but 85; as to why it’s labelled as 150, no idea.
Even frontally it’s 130, not 150;
2 Likes
Didn’t Oxy mention something about new Italian decals coming this update? Have we gotten a glance at those yet?
Isnt there even the footage available? lol
To make it look better so not too many people realise it’s + however many tons for a marginal amount of protection onto the turret cheeks (which weren’t where anyone reasonable was shooting an abrams anyway)
I think so? Im not 100% sure. But ultimately yeah. Its a really dumb situation. They should just say they dont want to add Anti-ERA to anything other than the Abrams and that realism is no longer the focus of the game
Funniest part has to be the claim that they didn’t have it because they didn’t specifically refer to it as K5 but as KE sensitive ERA… Because the British MoD would totally know what the russians call their brand new ERA, of course.
3 Likes
Kinda been clear since kh38MT implementation
3 Likes
or even before that with the BOL nerfs