Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Atm it requires you to have a radar lock but with the GR.4 radar you can only lock planes and ships

hey its me

i thought the GR.4 radar had a GMTI mode

I believe it only has a SEA radar but i can double check in a second

yep it only gets this
image

and this is the message when you try to use ALARMs
image

Devblog?
But we prefer now Dev Server Update:3

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/V5CF47ozJOvs
It waits since 2 years for its Spall-Liner

1 Like

Day 4 of asking gaijin to not split my country (Singapore)

9 Likes

Day 1197 of waiting for Polish tech tree, surprised this got flagged

9 Likes

Day something of Yugoslavia when?

Because it currently has placeholder AMRAAM code. And hasn’t been configured.

2 Likes

thank you, thought this might have been the case

Out of all the things that could have been used for placeholder code, I really want to know why they picked AMRAAM.

didnt all anti rads get SARH and ARH code instead of PRH when the dev server first opened, i think they just forgot to update it or are making its own code

I dont know. Im just thinking we had ARM in the NT event, you’d think that at worst, they would all be C&P of those ARM

in the NT event they werent the best guidance at all, it was bad in my experience, they kept missing or drifting off target

Where Thai VT-4

Still. What I was expecting over an AMRAAM.

Though I actually had fine experience with the AGM-88s in the event. Even got a few A2A kills

its weird but gaijin does gaijin stuff, but i wish they’d bring ECM back, a lot of vehicles ingame has ECM built in, like the su30 series, the tail boom has a built in ECM pod and EW stuff, the wing tips of the typhoon has EW built in im pretty sure, it’d make living much easier against the BUK and pantsir

1 Like

Yeah, definetly the logical next addition for aircraft I think