Hi @Smin1080p_WT sorry for asking again but you didnt see the first time i asked, the Devs gave the Hunter 2 extra Spikes that does not carry in real life, can we see the same with other IFVs that carry a small amount of spikes (4) for balance because of now with the spikes not working correctly you are stuck in 11.3-11.0 with just a slow firing 30mm
So other countries can get 10.0 ARM but 4 HARM max on A-7E which is the first aircraft to shoot them in combat is too much?
If you believe the Hunter is incorrect, that can be reported.
Extra Spikes are not currently planned for any other vehicles currently.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jbtXZUasjG8z
In that case, can you bump this report up? Spikes needs major fixing ASAP.
Could you please bump the L27 Pen report due to the possbility of L27 getting changed for ERA performance too?
Save the devs changing L27 twice
hell nahh i dont want the Hunter to get nerfed already
So it will be like 4 agm62, flir pod, 1 arm or 4 agm62 2 arm. Unless devs implement some loadout limits.
Idc if it loses 2 spikes as long as the ground launched spikes loft and perform its top down attack angle correctly tbh.
Its already been answered by a dev, I will update the report shortly.
Wasn’t the Japanese Design A-150 forwarded because part of a gun sleeve for the 510’s was manufactured, despite the rest of the ship never leaving the drawing board? (might have been something a little more then just the gun sleeve, but iirc it wasnt even a complete gun)
i have this question for a long time, Singapore is a small country where do you keep all the tanks and ifvs and exercise?
Everywhere in the country, that’s as much info as I can give you. Training vehicles are stationed in the country it is trained in like in the US, Germany or Australia etc.
1 Like
im still waiting for a limited ARM loadout for the GR1 hell raise it to 11.7 we already have the F-111C at 11.3
passed to the devs dont really follow the same rules
Can’t say I’m not disappointed by the reply since the ER and LR are very similar weapons just launched from different platforms. The video it shows pretty much shows the proper trajectory of the path by the Spike LRs.
1 Like
5 airports for the size of the country its pretty impressive
5 airfields*, 3 by the air force and 2 civilian. It’s called proper city planning, something most countries lack /s.
2 Likes
On that topic, I was wondering to what extend this applies;
Are OEM-Advertisments (made by said OEMs) that are within Jane’s publications allowed as source due to them being well… not made by Jane’s or is just the affiliation already enough to discredit it as source?
Same thing with “respected”/trustworthy authors like Ogorkiewicz who published their articles through Jane’s (e.g. in IDR, post-jane’s aquisition of INTERAVIA S.A. but not yet “Jane’s IDR”) aswell as through other publishers which would then in turn be allowed as source again - wheras to my understanding, if they published the exact same article through jane’s, it’d no longer be considered as source.
Would there be a possibility of exceptions if the author’s works are deemed reliable enough to be considered as source in other situations, or is anything related to Jane’s simply thrown out as unreliable?
i have videos of the Greek army testing that shows the projectory but i have to ask my friend that send them to me if its ok to sent them to others