Idk, I was talking about some stupid photoshop. I haven’t looked at the balance changes
yea i realized i was wrong and i got told it by like 8 diff ppl, no need to drag it
2 Likes
Knowing this forum expect it to be brought up anytime you’ll have an argument with someone who witnessed it.
Here people never forget nor forgive anything
oh
However, I wouldn’t be shocked it the eft was nerfed again lol
Give me LWS for M1A2C. In reality, such a system exists starting with M1A2SEPV1.
Eh, probably, I’m just more interested in where he found it as I couldn’t find the where the OG unedited and OG photo shop were posted. Who knows it’s probably lost to time.
google search, i forgot what forum but it was a military forum abt the same topic
1 Like
And w/ the focus on adding naval targets this update, including to the NT tests, it 's possible we’ll see the Chinese aircraft carrier mentioned as being in development last update come to the game either at the release of this one, or soon afterwards when the test(s) start.
1 Like
if it has been im gonna be taking a break until gaijin fixes there crap
so far this update in terms of britain atleast we got
a Sepv3 and an M1A1 (2 great additions)
M61 APHE for low tier (a great addition)
Challenger 2 mantlet buff (means barely anything)
and thats where it ends.
Challenger 1/2/3 Turret basket and FCS module nerf making the tank even weaker than it was before.
Refusal to give the tornado GR1 access to the ALARM
No plans to give the eurofighters access to more spice bomb when everyone else is
still not fixing serious challenger issues after 3+ years because there more focused on nerfing the vehicle.
Giving the HOSBO to only the german eurofighter throwing the “Technical compatibility” thing out the window
Not adding Spear 3 or a new Brimstone mode when were getting equivalents to both
and now a possibly nerf to the eurofighter fm???
gaijin is making really horrible decisions so far this update and its not going to be enjoyable to play and the games got to a point where even though i want to enjoy it and play it i cant defend it anymore
Thanks.
That makes sense, as I’ve seen a decent amount of CG photos come from other forums.
Yeah that image is fake. I remember it being posted a while ago and someone debunked it as being photoshopped.
But also even if it was real that twin pylon would block another rail so you would still end up with the same amount of AMRAAMs total making it completely pointless.
It has occured to me that since i ground the Vickers/export line out when i did way back i am actually closer to getting the Aussie M1A2 than i am the US one…
Hey, does anyone know if the two new US Abrams have the ability to mount the ROSY smoke+LWS modification? As of right now, looks like they don’t have it; just wondering if they have it irl.
ability? yes
has it been done irl on the M1A2C? dunno
1 Like
why there’s Isreal still have not better jet for top tier 14.3-14.7 ?
Why M-346 lack AIM-9M?
Yes and no, M900 is the 105 mm M68 gun series round (supplied by the Belgian company MECAR too). It does have comparable perfomance, but the base M1060 would have slightly less penetration (400 mm @ 60° / 2000 m). The M1060A1, M1060A2, M1060A3 and M1060CV would all have better penetration.
In WT you look at the 30° number:
Belgian 105 mm ammunition
Spoiler
| Designation | Gun | Caliber | Type | Velocity | Weight | Penetration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M393A2 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HESH | 732 m/s | 11.25 kg | ~127 mm | Belgian copy of US M393A2. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M416 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | Smoke (WP) | 732 m/s | 11.6 kg | / | Belgian copy of US M416. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1001 | NATO 105 mm M68/L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1525 m/s | 5.8 kg | ? | Monolithic tungsten alloy core. Cartridge length 985 mm. DST identifies weapon as M68 gun. Likely predecessor of M1050/M1060 |
| M1010 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HE-T | 700 m/s | 12.1 kg | / | 2.0 kg Comp B filler. Belgian indigenous HE round. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1050 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1510 m/s | 5.8 kg | ? | Monolithic tungsten alloy core. Cartridge length 927 mm. Specifically listed for L7 guns in DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1060 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1510 m/s | 5.8 kg | ? | Monolithic tungsten alloy core. Cartridge length 980 mm. DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M1060A1 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1510 m/s | 5.8 kg | 400 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | First major production improvement of M1060 family |
| M1060A2 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1460 m/s | 6.2 kg | 440 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | Longer/heavier penetrator |
| M1060A3 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1560 m/s | 6.2 kg | >500 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | Current KNDS Belgium specification |
| M1060CV | Cockerill 105HP | 105 mm | APFSDS-T | 1620 m/s | 6.2 kg | 560 mm @ 60° / 2000 m | Optimized for high-pressure 105HP gun |
| M1061 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HEAT-T | 1173 m/s | 10.5 kg | 400 mm | Modernized M456A2 derivative |
| M456A2 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HEAT-T | 1173 m/s | 10.5 kg | ~400 mm | Belgian copy of US M456A2. Confirmed in DST-1160Z-029-94 |
| M490 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HEAT-TP | Ballistically matched | 20.45 kg complete | / | Training round matched to M456A2 |
| M467 | NATO 105 mm L7 | 105 mm | HESH-TP | Ballistically matched | 20.42 kg complete | / | Training round matched to M393A2 |
| M1008 | NATO 105 mm L7/F1 | 105 mm | Illumination | / | 11.7 kg complete | / | WP illumination projectile |
| M1009 | CN-105-F1 | 105 mm | Smoke | / | 12.8 kg projectile | / | Listed for F1 gun; not specifically L7 |
| Falarick 105 | Cockerill 105HP | 105 mm | GLATGM | 370 m/s | 24 kg | 550 mm behind ERA | In-game |
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1001 APFSDS-T ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1010 HE ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1050 APFSDS-T ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1060 APFSDS-T ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M1061 (M456A2) HEAT ammunition
- [Dev] Leopard 1A5BE missing Belgian M393A2 HESH ammunition
4 Likes
