Kh-38MT has images (or an image?), the double/triple rack don’t (outside of mockups/photoshop)
yeah thought so, both planes have the exact same shade of light on their missiles yet the second plane is noticeably darker
they’re believed to be mocks since theres no evidence of them being shown/used outside of airshows from what ive found and from what i’ve been told
its an image of a wooden model, which is just as much proof as an official digital model. Its gaijin double standards
Please tell me you didn’t fall for that bad photoshop
tbf i thought the same but apparently the F16 above block 50/52 can use the AMBER dual rail system from the F15s, im looking for more evidence rn
Am i tripping or does someone is asking for non existing stuff ??
If we do talk RWS though
Then the funni CVRT :3
Looks more real than the photoshop thingy he sent lol, the pylons aren’t placed properly and the 120s are each the size of a agm88 xD
This is very clearly F-15 pylons photoshopped
They dont, smin and dev already gave their answers.
It was offered for india and turkish only. So even if they are real. Only turk and india get it. Although the india f21 was a failure
That picture still looks photoshopped as hell.
honestly with things like M113 TOWs as long as it has back up javelins I see that as completely viable tbh
It doesn’t look, it is blatantly, look at the size of the goddam amraams. They’re actually F-15 pylons photoshopped on F-16s
its prob fake, thats the first image ive seen of an F16 w the AMBER rails
they’re not amber bro they’re F-15 pylons
then why send it and claim it is photographic evidence?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1tykxr6/2551153_256028_part_5/
A large number of new map icons for naval units have been datamined, which follow the format of the mouse-overable type from the Nuclear Thunder event. Some of them are named as ship types which have not yet appeared in game, so I’ll reshare them here.
Generally they are divided into equivalent icons for NATO and USSR teams, but there are exceptions - note that it isn’t unusual for icons to pull double duty, which in turn informs us that a particular type of ship appearing/not appearing in the list of icons for one or the other team does NOT mean that this kind of ship will be exclusive to, or not appear for, that particular side.
USSR icons:
includes missile battleship
def_ussr_cruiser
![]()
def_ussr_frigate
![]()
def_ussr_corvette
![]()
def_ussr_destroyer
![]()
def_ussr_battleship
![]()
def_ussr_missile_boat
![]()
def_ussr_heavy_cruiser
![]()
def_ussr_missile_cruiser
![]()
def_ussr_missile_frigate
![]()
def_ussr_aircraft_carrier
![]()
def_ussr_missile_corvette
![]()
def_ussr_missile_destroyer
![]()
def_ussr_missile_battleship
![]()
def_ussr_missile_heavy_cruiser
![]()
def_ussr_boat_radar_target
![]()
def_ussr_frigate_radar_target
![]()
NATO:
includes missile coastals
def_nato_ally_boat
![]()
def_nato_ally_cruiser
![]()
def_nato_ally_frigate
![]()
def_nato_ally_corvette
![]()
def_nato_ally_destroyer
![]()
def_nato_ally_battleship
![]()
def_nato_ally_heavy_cruiser
![]()
def_nato_ally_missile_cruiser
![]()
def_nato_ally_aircraft_carrier
![]()
def_nato_enemy_boat
![]()
def_nato_enemy_cruiser
![]()
def_nato_enemy_frigate
![]()
def_nato_enemy_corvette
![]()
def_nato_enemy_destroyer
![]()
def_nato_enemy_battleship
![]()
def_nato_enemy_heavy_cruiser
![]()
def_nato_enemy_missile_cruiser
![]()
def_nato_enemy_aircraft_carrier
![]()
Please use Spoiler…

