the U.K has mounted javelines on the boxer MIV, the oshkosh JLTV has them and the stryker ICV-J has them but most of these are either troop transport like the JLTV or arent official mods like the Boxer MIV
Most vehicles that can mount CROWS will likely be able to mount CROWS-J as well
interesting, i got 0 education on british boxer variants
Depending on ammo capacity, I could see a styker or boxer with only javelin and a .50 cal being a viable addition
the Stryker ICV-J has the CROWS-J system mounted so it could come to the game with more modern variants of the stryker and boxer platform, issue is that the boxer MIV is a pure inf carrier like a JLTV, it has no offense weapons than onboard javelin or the inf
Yes but only if M1E3 ends up being the same as that demonstrator. I believe there was an interview that said javelin integration is not a high priority and might not make it onto the full production tank
i remember someone saying that the mock turret was only a place holder for the real turret which is sad
It seems like it would be too hard to reload to be worth putting on an abrams anyway, its much better suited for an IFV or something like a JLTV
Ajax IFV
ARTEC 30mm Boxer
ARTEC GmbH Boxer A1
Patria LMUK
and those are just the british ones that arent just using CROWS-J
there is a variant of the JLTV that could come but i fear it would be british or european because this specific variant was made for the european market atleast from the artical im reading from it says its for the euro market, it has a 25MM cannon and 4 missiles idk if they’re AA or AT missiles
Oshkosh is trying to get the USMC to purchase it but rn from the artical im reading says its british or european and this photo was taken outside of london so i fear it would be british
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/74DhWzB6LYhu
Seems like the SEPv3 is really going to remain a worse SEPv1…
Whoever makes these decisions at Gaijin is wild lmao. Adding a highly requested and very hypable top tier MBT and they make it redundant before it even hits the live server.
1 Like
A Patria AMV with a hellfire turret would be pretty cool as a high tier ATGM tank destroyer
im pretty sure the hellfires and brimstones mounted on tank turrets are MMW and we know gaijin aint adding MMW any time soon so i doubt they’ll come
1 Like
They still think 1979 and 2026 is the same thing lol
They smoked so hard that they think M1A2C, XM1147 are all correct designations
in the devblog they said it was called previously sepv3 and now m1a2C???
You can give them jesus, christ and the holy mother all together, they ain’t gonna accept that hull source
2 Likes
yeah its pretty depressing there is also literal photo evidence that the hull is thicker but hey cant really do much besides make posts complaining about it
also Renzo see that the challenger 3TD wasn’t included in the mantlet buff the other challenger 2s got lmao it really is the worst challenger past 11.7
2 Likes
ground launched MMV would probably far more balanced but gaijin is allergic to the idea of even considering MMV and they wont add a stop gap as it isnt historical (they will however completely ignore armaments for planes)
speaking of the 3TD, why was it added to the game? it isnt even in full production its barely just finished field testing
In the files it’s called challenger 2LEP lmao
A poor attempt to add a new hype vehicle that failed miserably
It could not exist and nothing would change minimally