Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

That’s the problem, the DM53 won’t have anti-era.

Hi Smin :) hope you’re enjoying the dev stuff :P
PS: Any idea if the mig21-2000 is gonna get derby missiles? tysm

Funny you mention this but ironically none of the L/44 guns are rated for DM73 anyway. So the best rounds are DM53(A1) or DM63(A1)

Now let me know when the other 90% of its bugs get fixed

Yeah. Totally unfair to add anything even close to onpar with any other nation

1 Like

Nothing for the Germans

I mentioned the DM73 only for the 2A7V, but all top-end Abrams tanks will get the M829A3.

Based upon this update so far. Its intoduced more bugs/issues than it resolved.

Sea Harrier cockpit is apprently even more buggy than it was before

I like it that way.
I can blame the vehicles (or devs) for poor performance instead of myself ;)

As always

They dont want to make smaller nations tanks better than Russias.

Its fine for Leopard 2A7 variants, M1A2 to be better than the T-90M but how could the rest?

In real talk the T-90 series is one of the worst tanks ever produced, it has a massive intrinsic design flaw.

Is there any chance of F-15C and A getting BOL cm like F-15C GE to make up for the countermeasure count nerf?

We got food for basically any plane (pucara, 189, hummel) and a premium puma.
Oh and ships (insert nobody cares about ships joke here)

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/f7XicTvZTUdc
@Smin1080p_WT could you check this bug report?

And, with anti-ERA tip, their DM53 will still perform roughly the same as M829A3!

Also need to take into account;

1- Only the 12.7 Abrams are getting M829A3, while giving DM73 to L/44 Leopards would imply giving it to 12.3s.

2- The Abrams are only now finally getting their historical service round; Leopard 2A5s getting a 2020s shell, one that entered service over a decade after they were phased out, would just feel… off. DM53 is their historical service shell.

the log in is also an issue for gaijin launcher just a heads up incase you wanna edit it

im aware, i used steam as an example

The developer did not provide any comments on this matter.

fair enough

Has anyone noticed that operating man-in-the-loop makes your plane go into a weird nose dive or a random direction at like 10Gs