Any hopes for this issue being resolved any time soon?
[DEV] Aircraft HUD Gunsights too sensitive when locking targets.
It’s been present for over a year now.
Any hopes for this issue being resolved any time soon?
[DEV] Aircraft HUD Gunsights too sensitive when locking targets.
It’s been present for over a year now.
Cool, but they are weak, their quantity is useless unless 2a7v are normal
yep controls bomb and missile camera
it is not sucky whatsoever, its a solid tank if you know how to position just like every tank, if i rush with a 2A7V i will get LFP’d, if i rush with a T90M i will get LFP’d, both have around the same weakspots with around the same survivability with the sole difference that there is more on the 2A7V cuz it has the ammo on the back of the turret
Ah, its under camera not weaponry
the J-22M1A with MITL at 9.0 is comedy
Why the hell was this never mentioned anywhere, this is a good change

yeah its great
the 2a5 2a6 2PSO are all amazing mbt idk what your talking about
the T90m has bad survivability decent armour its terribly slow has no gun depression etc
the 2a7v has good survivability good armour good mobility and good gun depression
the t90 is just as fast as a challenger the leopard is faster than both
@Smin1080p_WT I am wondering if it is intentional that the AGM-88C only has one radar band it can target for balance? Historically it has featured a broadband seeker that can target multiple bands.
Was trying to figure out how the hell to intergrate the new target point system, but now I ahve other options
Yeah, kinda needed as there is so many keys
I am surprised that no one has made a topic for M1A2 SEPv3’s hull armor…
Will it have to be me again? :/
the T90M has decent survivability, great armor and coverage, with little to no gun depression and bad reverse
the 2A7V has decent survivability with, great armor but bad coverage, and good reverse speed and good depression
T90M has almost the same HP per ton as the leopard 2A7V, sitting at 22.2 hp/t while the 2A7V its at 22.6 Hp/T, while the challenger sits at 19.2 HP/t dont you compare if you cant even check Hp/t of any of those tanks, i also need to say the challenger its at the most light variant
im more focused on the challenger 2 overhaul thread
@Smin1080p_WT
in case devs were wondering about MITL for germany…
its a proposed version of PARS with MITL, dunno how far it got.
may be worth looking into
heard it had increased range upto 15-16km
there is some footage from MBDA showing some sort of IR feed from the PARS back to the user
Already saw bug report on it.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/74DhWzB6LYhu
US and Britain get what is currently at best a sidegrade to the SEPv1 and suddenly we need an even better uparmored Leo for Germany and Sweden lol.
I agree that Germany could really use more uparmored Leos, but I would much prefer sidegrades or slight downgrades like the 2A6EX and TVM (or whatever that prototype was called).