Hey. No its not. As it would involve raising its BR. Its an intentional balance decision. But the GR.4 does.
happened to me, only way was for me to log into a guest account and look around
It’s incredible how fast things went from extreme joy to just dread for the British mains.
At least the US SEPv3 still has M829A3 giving it a single useful advantage over the SEPv1. The Australian SEPv3 doesn’t even have any useful advantages over the SEPv3.
1 Like
Submit a bug report
1 Like
so one of its literal main armaments is just being excluded fantastic
2 Likes
1 Like
its just so stupid, how the challengers rotating floor gets shot out and you lose your turret drive it makes no sense
1 Like
In order not to raise its BR to a level which the rest of the aircraft does not suit, yes. The ALARM is there for the GR.4 however.
2 Likes
smin why does the challenger get a turret basket.
6 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gcvaeG1VZj44
Hey Smin, there it is, please forward it :)
we were having a conversation.
care to reply?
Ah yes, my turret cheeks that were already impenetrable to almost everything except the 292 have now become impenetrable to everything including the 292.
Surely this is worth the considerable increase in weight (dev stream SEPv3 weight was WiP).
7 Likes
As we mentioned, all MBTs would be updated with this module. As others have already mentioned, this is a realistic modelling of the Challenger 2s internal modules and structures in line with the established modules in game on other tanks.
2 Likes
I would rather it go up in BR and actually get its historical loadouts but whatever I guess, the GR4 still needs 2 more ALARMs
1 Like
I’m at this point tbh
If the chally’s basket was the tax for getting the Abrams, then I wish they never got it in the first place.
3 Likes
no it isnt? the rotating floor isnt connected to the horizontal so them being connected on the damage model makes no sense
3 Likes