Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

The fact the F-14D gets no better missiles is sad. It should not be added in that state

9 Likes

so next step really is DM83 if im not mistaken

Probably

@Smin1080p_WT hello, can we except an opening of the dev server today?

1 Like

Next step is dm73 but major addition is dm83

then DM73 isnt need lmao, DM53 out of the L55A1 is already better then A3 just give us out anti ERA tips on things like L27A1 and DM53

this might be the end of Kontact 5 and Relik just eating darts

oxy said it should be soonish, so i beleive so

Pretty much, unless they decide to add IM propenlants, there it would make sense to upgrade to dm63/73

1 Like

Indeed, as I am beyond pissed right now too, but before today I was excited about the new mechanics.
Also, the US still has nothing on the current top tier air stack, so I guess we have to wait yet another update to be on equal footing with the Eurocanards and SM2s.

we will keep seeing this type of argument for all new Western Missiles

METEOR will be treated like this
IRIS-T, AIM-9X and ASRAAM will be treated like this
AIM-174 and AIM260 too will be treated like this

and there is nothing we can do about it because there’s no Public information to Disprove it

3 Likes

yeah it’s doesn’t make sense that the U.S gets a trophy system. But Leo 2s are one of the main tanks that are dominating in top tier

lets wait till dev then be upset okay so just wait like 1-2 hours then we can all be pissed at gaijin

1 Like

Germany has 1 tank that does well really.

Stingers treated like bee stingers

1 Like

which is exactly why Gaijin wont add them anytime soon

1 Like

CAMM is already suffering from this if im not mistaken, someone said it doesnt ever exceed 27g pull. About this topic i dont even get surprised anymore unfortunely…

1 Like

Stingers treated like the WWII Luftfaust

A3 has its anti ERA tip modelled so I dont see why not

This is the FY2026 budget but literally pick anyone since the SEPv3 got procured:

https://www.asafm.army.mil/Budget-Materials/#fy-2026
“turret and hull armor upgrades”
That’s separate from the reactive armor and mine protection also mentioned, so it’s clearly referring to the base armor.

SEPv3 has NEA/NGAP and that armor program is turret front, turret crew sides, turret bustle sides, and hull front. The fact that SEPv3 has upgraded hull armor is undeniable. I yield gaijin can basically pick a number for that since any percentage increase is a guesstimate based on past statements and programs, but you’re already doing that for the turret so what gives?

15 Likes

man where is gunjob when you need him i need him to give me hope of the sepv3 du hull being implemented