Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Game Discussion General Discussion
3312

Hey Smin,

is Germany still considered a major nation?

2 Likes
3313

Clearly not lmao

1 Like
3314

Anyway, seems Britain is the big winner of the update, again.

I completely do not mind that at all. Love me some Britain love.

1 Like
3315

dis

2 Likes
3316

I think you forgot adding the sub-tt vehicles to GB.

3317

Hey its atleast something, now i can just point and click on T80Us that just hold W to win

3318

Wish we got some better naval additions, even if that was just finally getting an R-Class

3319

you see its very serious directly from Japanese military forces

3320

My guess is the Moden Naval stuff is for the Nuke Thunder mode…just AI and Not player controlled -_- sad

3321

Yall have good naval vessels.

3322

Still an interesting statement when we don’t even know anything about the implementation.

3323

I had a better image in the original post from Aug 25, but the source deleted the image,
so had to edit in now, with what i could find.

In that image, there was a more proper detailed side by side comparison of the turret armor extension and hull extension in the Polish SEP v3 compared to the previous versions.

3324

image
wtf is this… the “modernized” HUD of the f14d

9 Likes
3325

U can still easily pen new abrams

3326

Yeah this is kinda bs, hope everyone gets anti ERA

1 Like
3327

I mean its pretty clear no matter how you look at it Germany really won’t be competitive WITH ONE TANK (the 2a6 and 2a5 are practically worthless in a lineup now)

1 Like
3328

Except for hull armor 2A6, 2A5 and 2PL seem pretty competitive. APS changes about nothing in tank to tank combat

3329

are they only for the new abrams, or also for the m1a1? (i shouldve grind america finish, i want the trophey abrams!!!)

3330

I mean they are much harder to intercept than a maverick tho, they are still mach 3 missiles

3331

@Smin1080p_WT I’m concerned that the US and UK will now both have duplicate Australian M1A1 AIMs as a Squadron vehicle, and that there will be a large gap at BR 10.7 to 12.7 in the UK’s Export/Commonwealth line.

  1. Was the Australian M1A1 AIM considered as a UK Researchable vehicle instead of Squadron, in order to bridge this gap?
  2. If not, is other equipment in planning for the new 10.7-12.7 gap?
  3. Will the US M1A1 AIM be changed (eg. to USMC skin), or replaced by an different Squadron vehicle near the BR?
  4. Given that this will bring them up to 20 vehicles in the UK TT, is Australia a Subtree yet?
1 Like