My guess is the Moden Naval stuff is for the Nuke Thunder mode…just AI and Not player controlled -_- sad
Yall have good naval vessels.
Still an interesting statement when we don’t even know anything about the implementation.
I had a better image in the original post from Aug 25, but the source deleted the image,
so had to edit in now, with what i could find.
In that image, there was a more proper detailed side by side comparison of the turret armor extension and hull extension in the Polish SEP v3 compared to the previous versions.
wtf is this… the “modernized” HUD of the f14d
9 Likes
U can still easily pen new abrams
Yeah this is kinda bs, hope everyone gets anti ERA
1 Like
I mean its pretty clear no matter how you look at it Germany really won’t be competitive WITH ONE TANK (the 2a6 and 2a5 are practically worthless in a lineup now)
1 Like
Except for hull armor 2A6, 2A5 and 2PL seem pretty competitive. APS changes about nothing in tank to tank combat
are they only for the new abrams, or also for the m1a1? (i shouldve grind america finish, i want the trophey abrams!!!)
I mean they are much harder to intercept than a maverick tho, they are still mach 3 missiles
@Smin1080p_WT I’m concerned that the US and UK will now both have duplicate Australian M1A1 AIMs as a Squadron vehicle, and that there will be a large gap at BR 10.7 to 12.7 in the UK’s Export/Commonwealth line.
- Was the Australian M1A1 AIM considered as a UK Researchable vehicle instead of Squadron, in order to bridge this gap?
- If not, is other equipment in planning for the new 10.7-12.7 gap?
- Will the US M1A1 AIM be changed (eg. to USMC skin), or replaced by an different Squadron vehicle near the BR?
- Given that this will bring them up to 20 vehicles in the UK TT, is Australia a Subtree yet?
1 Like
Rheinmetall on DM53/63:
Rheinmetall uses a special state-of-the-art tungsten penetrator that is capable of
overcoming the most extreme cutting and bending forces of double-reactive armour.
This makes it possible to defeat all known types of tank armour, including multi-layer
and composite arrays and reactive armour systems at all ranges of engagement.
Even at long ranges of engagement, it can perforate the main armament behind the
double-reactive armour front module of modern MBT. Fired from L44 and L55 tank
barrels, the ammunition is extremely accurate.
8 Likes
all m1a2’s atleast for the us
Doesnt mean we should only get kinda dull ships every update.
Last update we got essentially C&P Coastal. We are now getting another largely C&P coastal as a premium and a destroyer that isnt really different to any other we’ve got.
I dont think the R-Class (A ship that has been in-game in the soviet TT for 2 years?) is an unreasonable ask or for something like a County-Class destroyer to give us a SAM ship that several nations have also had for years
1 Like
Those all have issues with 0 armour while being as mobile there’s no reason why the PSO shouldn’t get its frontal lip to make a second competitive tank
Pretty sure that was reported multiple times for DM53 already
2PL missing it’s spall liners though :(
1 Like
Worst thing is that the hull roof addon acutally makes the PSO worse because they still haven’t fixed the angle bug haha
honestly I was mainly happy with the ALARMs getting an actual decent top tier MBT that is just a bonus