Ok…EZ pass then, 9L not even close to that 🤑 tag
Waiting for pucara preorder release day 3 i guess.
the F4F ICE? the super sonic one wirh IRCCM AiM-9L/i and AIM-120? that F4 ICE?
A 130mm gun corresponding to the destroyer class “Le Hardi” has been seen in datamine.
I also hope Gaijin will add MEXAS to the 1a5BE,Even if it’s not possible I can hope that this armor upgrade will be a researchable add-on armor module specifically for the Leopard 1a5BE :)
9 Likes
Considering how the MEXAS would change some things like turret traverse speed, I think it could also be a separate vehicle, but as this one was in-service with the MEXAS package too, it should definitely come!:
Bug reports for the 1A5BE munitions (all are accepted and passed to the devs):
Fun fact: Technically Belgium was the first user of the Leopard 1 in-service in NATO.
3 Likes
Yeah sure, this is a trade-off of adding mexas to the 1a5 turret, but at least the turret will be good enough to hold CE rounds :)
1 Like
dont get me wrong i think the challenger 2s can do well I just think that they are probably the worst tanks at top tier as even the Ariettes at least have mobility and a decent gun, the challengers only have armour with the worst mobility and worst penning round at top tier
this update is a mixed bag for me on one hand we are getting an M1A2 and M1A1 which will massively help, on the other the challengers are getting their basket nerfs (even though the tank doesn’t physically have one) and if they want to say the floor effects the turret ring then the autoloader should disable the turret ring on soviet and chinese tanks.
1 Like
the worst thing is based on trial photos the ALARM could come to 4 separate planes yet is only on 1 for some reason the Harrier Gr7 is already at 12.3 I see no reason why that cant get ALARMs but here we are
The br argument is kinda retarded as well, as how are arm any better than mavs when mavs can lock onto tanks even without a radar and they are found at brs as low as 10.0/.3. Having alarms on the gr1 was what i was mainly looking forward too as who wants to play top tier to bring the gr.4? Nothings gonna make me play top tier, no one wants to be facing bmpts every game.
For me the update heavily depends on how they handle the SEPv3(s). If they are going to make them actually worthwhile I’ll be hyped, but if they keep them redundant (especially the US one) as the worst 12.7 Abrams than it’s a bit of a hype killer.
2 Likes
its even funnier because the new yak-130 has 4 TV guided bombs at 9.3 and the J-22 has 4 MAVs at 9.3
BRs where the only AA are at most manpads with no radars
J-22 is 10.7 in GRB and Yak-130 have no CMs with 4 trash TV KABs at 9.3
1 Like
is it? oh fair still the Yak-130 at 9.3 with 4 TV guided bombs is so stupid
So is A-4E Early while also having CMs with 2 walleyes and GBU-8
2 Likes
yeah its also stupid lol this isnt a russia bias thing, more its dumb they are using BRs as an argument for ARMs
yeah I feel that, the Aussie M1A2 not getting an anti ERA tip is a bit of a let down but I get it, assuming the M1A2T also doesnt get A3 anyway. The Aussie M1A2 still has the best camo and camo net in the game tho
Meanwhile my a7 is sat at 10.7 due to 6 walleyes. I did see those and it just screams double standards, worst part being the people complaining about the lack of missiles (think it could maybe get r73 or r77) on the yack which could put it at a more realistic br but no, gotta put it at the non existent gap they think exists.
Its not a sim when they deliberately withhold things to ensure a vehicle stays at a br they want, especially when said attempts are usually not even good enough to keep it at the br they want it at.
Yes. Its still better than jh7a2 is many way.