I really dislike the mentality of dismissing entire nations based on top tier. It isn’t the only thing that matters, and it shouldn’t be the only place people care about.
No one cares about lower BR C+P, only top tier.
2 Likes
The SU-27M (SU-35 Early) is much less advanced than the SU-30SM, as it lacks TVC, but has larger vertical stabilizers, canards, and the pre-PESA integration N011 radar.
1 Like
Su-35 early then, could work
Britain doesn’t use the SU-30 or gripen last I checked. Sub trees shouldn’t exist as a tt extension, and should be like helicopter trees. Gaijin being lazy and not wanting to integrate this feature has doomed the game to every tree being the same.
4 Likes
That is true to a degree, and I agree as well, however the interests dictate more interests and money. And perhaps the speculation about someone giving BVVD cash to move all plans for Japan and dump them into China isn’t excluded from possibilities
6 Likes
Sorry. We know you dont make the rules. But we are not allowed to discuss “possible” decisions made by HQ? And when/if they officially announce?
is this separate BR for naval new?
Spoiler
If Britain has the Indian tree it should get access to the best and the worst. SU-30MKI Should come to Britain if/when they decide to add it.}
I personally don’t love that idea but that’s the premise Gaijin have set themselves. Maybe it comes as an event vehicle for Russia a Rusfed jet that can use NATO missiles like the Iranian F-14
That’s the OG “Su-35” right? It even has canards iirc, and I remember the thing from Ace Combat 5
I agree, people only look at top tier/MBTs only and in turn act like X nation has nothing when just a few BRs/a rank down it has plenty of unique stuff.
1 Like
has been since seperate BRs were first made
1 Like
The SU-30MKI, one of the best SU-30 variants up to the SU-30SM, should not be fighting against SU-30s for RU. That is just silly and detracts from the game experience.
2 Likes
But Japanese, US and Israeli F-15s should fight each other?
That argument is long dead the game is never going back to Warsaw pact vs NATO
2 Likes
how about zhe totschlagargument
do you want the fully bluefor MiG-29G to fight Russian MiG-29s?
I am
Mainly referring to ASB in which those nations do not generally face eachother. Also, I do not condone the F-15 being in those trees as well.
I am not the one who creates rules, yes, but from what I can see, y’all ofc can be able to discuss that, as long as it doesn’t really break rules (from what I can see, the most common reason is profanity and politics), hence why I repeat Rule 3.8 for example, as it is broken quite a lot :/
2 Likes
so anyways lets divert this convo to one of my personal favorite topics.
This plane scares me, and I want it. But will gaijin give it Brimstones (because if it doesn’t get them there’s no reason to add the damn plane)
The MIG-29G was also a silly add and simply a stopgap so they didn’t have to add anything else that is unique.
1 Like
Yes as long as everyone is being civilized men (and women), if you know what I mean.
it was an aircraft the Luftwaffe used for over 10 years
it’d be hideous not to add it
1 Like