if its a US thing… it belongs in the US tree
you explained it yourself
1 Like
Yet how come the ADATS isn’t in their tree along with the F-111C ?
Both US tech and have no relation but yet still ended up in our tree
1 Like
bad decisions on gaijins part, nothing new
Well technically the ADATS is Canadian and the 111 Aussie :p
2 Likes
So are you ok with Britain having only 2 SPAA above 8.3 ?
With non top tier ones at all
made and designed by & in USA, likely tested in USA too
Welcome to how exporting vehicles works enjoy
2 Likes
are there really no other alternatives?
I haven’t looked so I can’t comment but I don’t believe so at least to the ADATS
No, I’d take the same issue if Germany got a MiG they never used, especially when they could probably get something through an Argentina.
ADATS and F-111C are added through the Canadian and Australian ‘subtrees’. Gaijin isn’t making up that Britain used the ADATS or F-111C, they are using subtrees to fill in holes.
1 Like
it still has a whole lot more to do with USA than UK, so it was a choice purely based on UK main wanting F-111K, but they couldnt add it since it was never actually flown or even fully built, so they gave them the 111C, which from what ive heard is roughly equivalent to the tornadoes
I want Polish techtree for couple of reasons:
K2 Black Panther
and also various modernizations of eastern equipment
9 Likes
Neither are sub-trees. Else we wouldn’t be having the issue of them being ripped apart.
2 Likes
no bias here
but really some of the stuff is quite cool
1 Like
Canada and Australia isn’t a sub tree plus if that was real then we have the right to their Hornets then lol
TKS-20,
7TP,
10TP.
This is true polish vehicles. Armored winged hussars
4 Likes
It seems Canada wont ever be a sub and its vehicles will be split between Germany and the UK based on needs
1 Like
Which really sucks if you want to get Canadian vehicles. Currently, most are either event or premium tanks.
3 Likes
Polish Bt-7.
3 Likes
Its very unfortunate and I feel for Canadians who want their own representation