The fact you said the Mig-29 isn’t top tier is wrong and falsely claimed as 13.7 is the highest BR and 13.0 can see that BR so it’s top tier.
In that case, the Sea Harrier is Britain equivalent to the MiG-29, so why would they receive any more
See harrier is at 13.0 I would still class that as top tier
Anything below 12.7 is not top tier it’s high tier
likely going to be an event like the u boat one
Yes, the Sea Harrier is equivalent to the MiG-29, the F-4F is equivalent to the Late Tornado and the F/A-18 is equivalent to the Gripen. There is no need for Britain to get a Hornet.
If that the case Germany got the Tornado, F-4 ICE and the Mig-29 so it doesn’t need the F/A-18, correct ?
i think its cuz the Australian AIM had a fair number of tradeoffs to keep it 11.3 worthy vs an American service AIM which would have a better round and armor.
No? Germany has no equivalent to Gripen.
Would the F/A-18 be more powerful than the Gripen right ?
depends a lot on what they add and what they add it with tbh
6 Likes
True true
No
1 Like
Show me a comparison between the F/A-18C and the Gripen C
Make me
i mean the F/A-18 has slightly more missiles than a grippen
2 Likes
Then I can’t believe your claim about it being equivalent to Gripen. I mean how can I trust you when you already falsely claimed about the Mig-29
Look at it it’s beautiful, perfect even.
And and top of that there’s only one place it could go the UK.
Spoiler
1 Like
well, the hornet can carry a whole lot more
3 Likes
@quartas121 & @Tictaculer thank you for that info, if the Hornet is better via armement count then it is better than the Gripen in that regard