isn’t that a 2a5M ?
I can barely tell them apart.
But the sideskirts are still pog
“I would like for the Devstream to be today but i dont know if it is” Jean just said
HAAIP got value at least. Neither Farnham nor EPSOM have anything said about them
What I can say sure is Challenger 3 TD(what will be introduced as Challenger 3 (P) as game) has full bustle rack in the turret rear, by modifying Challenger 2 turret
![IMG_20190216_154454|750x1000]
(about 1:10)
the place where bustle rack would be placed will be where TOGS rack, gun control equipment and NBC stationed, as this place was originally considered to be the place to station the autoloader for Challenger 2 LIP
It’s a malnourished tech tree. Germany isnt.
It literally says turret from and sides as for values no idea but considering the base armour package for CR2 has changed in nearly 30 years I’d imagine the Farnham armour package that was developed to replace Dorchester is considerably improved.
It is from such people who love double standards and cry without any reason that many gaming nations are left unattended. And in this tone you can speak with your friends, and not with strangers
“Enhanced” or “improved” are totally meaningless without any context as to what or how. You would know this already as you were part of the previous challenger topics on the old forum where we already explained that the devs can’t do anything with sources that just use those words.
1 Like
Are you crying again?
the UK tree is only missing light tanks at top tier, it certainly isnt malnourished just saying
Well, Farnham is the inside armor. EPSOM is the package outside
Just say no
I already suggested britain should get the aussie kf41 since they really need a better ifv.
Germany has soooo many options. Besides the warrior 2000 what more modern ifv does britain have?
light tanks, ifv and an spaa for the in between brs of 8.3 to 10.3 (basically a 9.3 spaa for example)
i mean literally all top tier tanks are made up values for armour or just educated guesses. id rather see stuff changed for balance reasons at top tier than literally having to commit espionage to get it “realistic”
There’s barely any consistant lineups you can make. The CR2s are mismodelled and broken, there’s barely any light tanks and 1 IFV, compared to other TTs i’d say it lacks pretty hard.
How about the australian Redback ??? that one actualy got accepted , while australia denied the KF41, it has nothing to do with australia or UK anymore
4 Likes
does it also have blowout panels?
Why? It wasn’t even accepted. That’s like Germany getting it’s trialed EBR 1954s.
Or japan getting the f16
Oh wait