Hopefully.
Do they care not really
Yes I want AMRAAMs because the F-16D is lame and slow and weighs a lot. And then French get a plane with 12 Magic IIs and USSR gets 4 R27ERs and 2 ETs and 4 R73s
Magics 2 are not fox 3 like AMRAAMs, just saying.
And don’t start, you all have twice our number of missiles since years ! :p
It’s time some justice happen.
The F16 is not overperforming, the R-27ER is the best missile in the game by far and outshadows the AIM-7M.
AIM-9Ms are easily defeated if you don’t have brain rot, and r77’s aren’t that hard to preflare / outrange. The fight is never about IR missiles, simply that Russia already outranges America and the AIM120 would reel back in that advantage to a more level playing field.
I know that
The AIM-120A/B is an asymmetrical equivalent to the R-27ER, anyway, with it having worse performance but being ARH.
Copium 6 flareable missiles and 4 that die to low alt something else to add
So true
No. Too early for that.
R73 is unflarable within 1.5 km skill issue for you if you get them flared
I remember the flanker who use N001(radar) is not able to use R77(J-11 is ok, since PLAF updated them through hack the weapon system)
You can flare it below 1km if you do not have brain rot like most of NATO players
No, you cannot. The seeker cannot see anything outside of its target within ~1.5km.
thinking trough i dont believe the 2A7V will come with DM73 but with DM63 since russia has only developed 3BM59 so far as the best shell fired from a 125mm as far as i know, so chances are that we may be getting abrams with M829A3 instead of A4 and leopard with DM63 and T90M with 3BM59
DM63 is just DM53 that’s harder to set off, so it wouldn’t be that hard to make for the game.
The game data showing that 3dm59 is only 590/0 degree in 0m
Nice joke mate it can still see below those ranges have seen many times people flare it at those ranges and many times i flared it at those ranges aswell
Fake
Either you’re lying or what you saw wasn’t an R-73.