Yeah, in the future. I even stated many times over that the MICA-NG cannot come until the Rafale F4.2 gets added. I never stated it should come now.
Everything else you’re writing is gibberish. But it is going to be important imo that the community is aware every time you request historical fixes that you’ve had no problem denying historical fixes for others. I’ll continue to support requests from others, but you can’t seriously be pretending to be on the side of historical fixes.
Look. Its pretty clear now that Gaijin doesnt care about historical accuracy.
Which is why BOL is still artifiically nerfed. The Typhoons FM is still underperforming, Harriers are still the way they are, CR2s still the weakest tank in-game, etc etc.
I genuinely cant think of a single thing that is actually performing according to IRL specs. Not one thing.
So frick it.
Lets just embrace that fact and start demanding bug fixes that actually balance the game, instead of rendering the game a one-side mess. Especially as they cant decompress to save their lives either.
So no. In this instance, where MICA EM are already on live pretty OP, but on dev look to be coming truly a gamebreaking weapon, to such a degree that its probably gunna render top tier unplayable for everyone else… again… I dont thin the MICA EM needs buffs
They can already engage targets in a 360° envelope, out speed every other missile, have a way harder seeker to defeat than anything else “because reasons” and all on a platform that is overperforming by a lot.
What more do you really want? Do you really just want 16 Rafales vs 16 Rafales at top tier? Because even with the Aim-120 Buffs. Im really not sure the Typhoon is going to be able to compete. Like at all.
Let alone anything else.
Rafale might be about to become the first 15.0+ aircraft
The only thing left is that you admit you yourself also don’t care for historical accuracy. You make narratives that suit you. In fact, when it comes to all the missiles that got buffed, the MICA was actually the biggest loser. It got the least range buff comparatively, while now being worse than the R-77-1 in medium range HOBS, I already did a whole assessment on it. But this topic is just a distraction from whether or not you operate based on consistent principles and whether or not your pleas should be heard/listened to.
Ive been arguing for “historical accuracy” for years. and they keep saying that is what they are believe in, and then just deny bug reports for made up reasons or just pretend bug reports dont exist.
So no. tbh, I really dont care about it anymore, ebcause its pretty clear the devs dont.
I want buffs for the vehicles that needs buffs and those that dont need buffs should wait.
Sure, the MICA EM can get more buffs once everyone else has gotten buffs and caught up a bit. but right here, right now. In this major update? Like I want to be able to play top tier without just instantly dying the moment a Rafale enters within 30km.
Uh? No?
You have consistantly argued that the Rafale needs buffs to compete, even when it was steamrolling every single match and rendered top tier a 1 aircraft race.
But you have consistantly fixated on the weakest parts. “Oh the Rafale is the weakest jet at top tier because the MICA EM has the shortest range BVR missile, and range is really important, its unfair that the Typhoon gets C5s because they can just keep the Rafale at range and there isnt anything we can do about it, just ignore the 2+ K/D the Rafale has at the moment”
You came into a random thread about the AMX and started bullying me for not wanting the OP missile to become more OP.
Gunna start harrasing @MiGoon_Fox-3 or @ScimitarsCurse for voting no too? Along with everyone else who voted against it?
You talk about it looking “bad” me for me to vote no against a buff that I dont even entirely beleive is a real issue, when you and Vis just came into a random thread, took it massively off-topic and started bullying someone for disagreeing with the need to buff OP weapons
Is this about those french missiles “losing out after the amraam change” post
I also dont fully believe the post. Im extremely skeptical of how certain users such as Macron present how french kit should perform after the rafale fake buffs, notabug’d corrective nerfs and such. Macron also guilty of that with the screenshots of a rafale radar screen that gunjob called out for have getting it’s aspect ratio widened to look like it’s better.
It was a precautionary no, no different to when a Chinese account posts a new image that’s not really been seen on the web before (this is because of the AI incidents from their community, not because they are Chinese)
Would also rather not get involved in a handbag fight with that lot so this is my last comment on it especially on a non relevant thread.
Just to get the thread back on track,
This is the Brazilian AMX yes?
Seems like it’s solid enough for the BR in air, even if the F-5 spam ruins that BR a lot of the time.
It does seem very high for a plane with only laser guided CAS in GRB when you see the SPAA it faces, but this is because the SPAA it faces are generally far too undertiered.
It’s BR compression basically. Hopefully gaijin pulls their finger out and does some massive decompression of GRB so that these planes can actually do something against the blatantly OP 2s6 and peers
The issue is why its higher than the TT AMX
difference:
For GRB… the better tpod might be enough to justify the higher BR… maybe…
But for ARB, there is just no justificaiton for it, especially with 4x 9L slingers also at 10.7. You can maybe, just maybe make an argument that 2x MAA-1s are better than 2x 9Ls, but not that they are better than 4x 9Ls
Pretty much
Why give the best missile in the game which already has the only unique seeker among ‘modern’ Fox-3s (cause that’s fair?) and is getting its most notable aspect (turn performance) buffed even more?
I’m also voting no because I don’t trust much of what he (macaroni) says to be true.
Considering how insanely biased he is towards that vehicle I do not trust him
Watch this get flagged
For Italian 1995 Tornado IDS worse thermals don’t give it lower BR, although iirc when I asked Smin why AMXes and Tornado in the the same situation have different treatment, he answered that it’s also because of better AAM, which matters against other aircraft in GRB as well, so they think Piranha is better enough than AIM-9L to justify higher BR (apart from thermals).
Which is dumb given what is actually below the A-1A in terms of A2A in GRB like the Hawk 200 RDA
Ngl while the thermals are much better, untill they make the usage of the guided bombs possible on ground modes this is completely useless as well lol.
Id say that at this point, after multiple people said this same thing for ages, this is just an situation where gaijin wont do s about it and if i would say what i really think what this is it would probably leave me banned here…
Really frustrating to see the singular plane from my country be like this in game.
While Im also hoping for some day to get the Brazilian subtree, gaijin also seems to be giving more priority into adding european/asian subtrees where they can copy and pase every single “new” vehicle
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Amx A1A need to be at 10.7 in ARB, and honestly I think in Grb too at 11.0. Its just that weak plane. MAA piranha is a garbage at this time.
The ARB BR definitely needs to go down I agree.
However I don’t really think the GRB at 11.0 would be that beneficial. At 11.0 you still see pantsir the majority of the games (speaking from Super Étendard experience). The BR would need to go to at most 10.7 for it to not feel sad, but I also think that it would be a tad too low, as 9.7 down tiers are going to be a bit rough for the opponents. Sadly, these kinds of subsonic aircrafts with advanced air to ground are kinda stuck until ground is decompressed as a whole
Agree. But at 11.0 at least its possible useful. At this time at 11.3 its just a garbage.
Well i proposed to 10.7 simply because at 10.3 you have the premium a10a which is a menace at downtiers because of the 9Ls at a br where quite alot of the enemies doesn’t have flares, at 9.7 some planes get flares to be able to counter it.
Also only moving on grb to 11.0 wouldn’t change anything as 11.0 is still in easy range for those same spaa’s, staying at 10.7 would mean that only on uptiers you would suffer against them.
Well the update doesnt helped… Its even worse now.
yeah lol, now your getting smoked by quite alot of planes using the newly buffed sparrows …
i made this thinking about this plane, however i think it would be a bit offtopic here so yeah.
Also while looking on mectron’s website on the wayback machine, i saw this about the Maa-1 piranha missile, which says it has 50G’s instead of 45G, not really sure it would change much however could help a bit , also while it doesnt describe how it works, it says it has a way to know the difference of an false target which makes me think it should have a better flare resistance than in game aswell
https://web.archive.org/web/20100808063902fw_/http://www.mectron.com.br/maa_ft.html