M829A3 Bug report advice

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
1

Hi, im putting together a bug report for the implementation of M829A3 and would appreciate any advice. My report details and proves that M829A3 does not use a steel tip anti ERA assembly and instead is a 806.5x25mm DU longrod. The method of defeating K5 ERA is just shear brute force from the material strengh of the thick rod. This implementation would boost the flat pen from 634mm at 10m to over 700 at 10m

Page_1report
Page_1report886×1252 257 KB

page_2report
page_2report889×1230 349 KB

Page_3report
Page_3report889×1257 201 KB

page_4report
page_4report889×1257 343 KB

If there is anything incorrect please point it out. Thankyou

1 Like
2

Just realized i forgot to remove an incorrect source from the body of the argument where it was removed from the appendix. Ignore source FY2003/2004 DOT&E annual report as this has no mention of the design of m829a3

3

There was also an error in the maths that im correcting now, Will reply again with a fixed version of the document

4

M829A3 Bugreport_page-0001
M829A3 Bugreport_page-00011241×1754 512 KB

M829A3 Bugreport_page-0002
M829A3 Bugreport_page-00021241×1754 629 KB

M829A3 Bugreport_page-0003
M829A3 Bugreport_page-00031241×1754 176 KB

M829A3 Bugreport_page-0004
M829A3 Bugreport_page-00041241×1754 554 KB

Here is a fixed version. Love spotting so many errors within minutes of posting

1 Like