I dont want every variant of sherman in every tree I agree. but notable ones ought to at least be present.
1 Like
exactly, there are definetly like 1 or 2 notable shermans left for UK imo, look at Ixtav’s list, but the M4A3E8 isnt one of those for the UK
1 Like
fair. It would just be filler for a Canadian subtree which storm wants added in a way I find to be very clunky
1 Like
i wouldnt mind a Canadian subtree but only if they cut out the bland copy paste like CF-188 (it is literally just an F/A-18A license made) and Grizzlies (b-b-b-but the tracks are different!), and left the cool stuff like the CF-100 and CF-105, and the one open TOW car thing @StormRyder13 suggested
1 Like
I take it you didn’t read the post.
225 rounds (plus light and moved MG) is some differences, yes, not enough for the US tree but more than enough for other trees.
wasnt there a spotlight attachment for US shermans too? they could easily just add it to the US Sherman
also, the 225 rounds are an active detriment to the player since i doubt they all had the whole wet storage setup and outright increase your chances to get one shot on a penetrating hit
the moved MG was also a thing on US M4A3E8
I agree other than the CF188 as its canadas only fighter at the moment. the hornet isn’t a unique plane as it has potential to be added to most trees so gatekeeping it seems foolish to me.
Grizzly has a bomb thrower unlike normal Shermans as they were built specifically to the British doctrine spec. the track difference isn’t the main thing tbh.
1 Like
right now only 2 trees are more or less confirmed to get it and it should stay that way, no need for even more copy pasted US jets at top tier when no subtree or tree ever used them outside of US and Sweden (Finnish Hornet)
I’m going to point out you just said to leave out Canada’s Pirmary and Only modern fighter. (also it’s not Canadian built, we force the US company to open supply lines for all F-18s here.)
Smoke launchers(is a very big gameplay change), and it’s Candian built. Let’s leave out the Ram why don’t we?
isnt this a smoke launcher? on a US sherman?
canadian built sure, but thats still a sherman
your just digging the hole deeper with the CF-188 thing, now its not only US copy paste, but it wasnt even made in Canada to boot
thats only true because Australia and Canada were screwed over by not being subtrees.
I mean imagine if japans air subtrees vehicles went to native trees instead it would suck
Thats T14, not a sherman. that was meant to be a universal tank between the USA and UK, the bomb thrower was a British requirement
1 Like
its a bit frustrating to see every thing US express sent to as many trees as possible, and the hornet (and super hornet to a higher degree) is the chance to put an end to it for now
Im not against the US and japanese trees having harriers or the Israeli and Swedish trees having centurions (or the potential for benelux cents either) that’s the nature of exported vehicles, America will always have the F22
1 Like
Now if you made your point, get out.
This is a suggestion for Canada’s primary tank of the Koran War; it should join Canada in its home in one tree. And I’ve already said my stance on where Canada should be placed.
If you want a skin for the US-operated Easy 8s, the skin section is that-away, go make a suggestion there.
hes being courteous about it man dont be an ass over the discussion
no country ingame as a tree or subtree now (except for US ofc) use the Super Hornet, and like i said only 1 other (Finland) uses the horent so for once a US high/top tier jet might NOT be spammed to like 3 nations
F-22 and F-14 look to be the only top/high tier fighters that wont be sent to other nations for sure, and theres a chance that can happen with the super hornet which would really be great
as for the M4A3E8, everything but the extra ammo (im sure some got field modified by US crews to carry more, but more than likely not the same exact way as the Canadian one, and smoke grenades can be put on US M4A3E8)
I wouldn’t be an ass if this didn’t happen EVERY SINGLE TIME. It’s very clear I never should have made these suggestions, no matter how close the vehicle was to my heart.
And for all of you: “Don’t like seeing your tech in other trees don’t export it”
Hey britain wasnt allowed to keep the Lancaster to ourselves so sometimes its nor perfect
1 Like
its the nature of the suggestion. Canada isn’t a subtree of Britain even tho it should be, so discussion about placement and C&P are major points for discussing.
1 Like