M24 (FL10) - The Old Switcheroo

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

M24 (FL10)

   Hello everybody. I’d like to suggest a M24 (FL10) for France’s Ground Forces in War Thunder. As part of efforts to modernize the French Army’s M24 Chaffee fleet, a Chaffee hull was paired with the FL10 turret. Although initial tests were conducted, the project was ultimately canceled after a critical safety issue was discovered in the turret design. As a result, the initiative was shelved, leaving only a single prototype of the M24 (FL10).


History

Background

The largest user of the Chaffee outside the United States was France, with the French Army receiving over 1,200 M24s for service in Indochina and Metropolitan France. Initial deliveries of M24s to French units in Indochina began in the late 1950s. French-operated M24s played a notable role in Indochina against the Viet Minh, as their light weight and mobility allowed them to traverse marshes, swamps, and rice paddies, which was inaccessible to the French-operated Stuarts. Additionally, the M24 had access to excellent ammunition options, excelling in high-explosive firepower compared to the Stuart.

The M24s were used in various crucial tasks, including convoy security, infantry support, static defense, patrolling, and offensive armor/infantry sweeps against enemy forces. Following France’s withdrawal from Indochina, many M24s were transferred to the newly formed Army of the Republic of Vietnam. France retained a significant number of M24s, and they were again deployed to Algeria during the Algerian War of Independence, where they served in infantry support roles until the war’s end.

Putting AMX-13’s FL10 Turret on M24 Chaffee Hull

At the time, the French Army operated the largest fleet of M24 tanks outside the United States, and French companies explored various modernization options for the M24 fleet. For instance, during the Algerian War around 1960, France deployed a number of AMX-13 tanks equipped with Chaffee turrets. These hybrid vehicles, known as AMX-13 Chaffees or AMX-13-M24, were highly favored by French tank units. The M24 Chaffee turret provided superior high-explosive firepower, making it particularly effective against anti-colonial guerrilla forces.

In May 1959, the French Army decided to explore the reverse approach by mounting the AMX-13’s FL10 turret onto the M24 Chaffee hull. Collaborating with DEFA, a French government-owned weapons manufacturer, they converted a single M24 Chaffee into a prototype with the FL10 oscillating turret. Trials were completed, and the results indicated that modernizing the M24 fleet with FL10 turrets was both cost-effective and feasible. However, the project was discontinued due to a significant safety flaw related to the turret’s design. The CN 75-50 gun in the FL10 turret used an automatic loading system for standard rounds, but high-explosive (HE) shells had to be manually loaded by the commander. This process was extremely hazardous in the confined space of the turret, especially given the sensitive fuzes on the HE rounds. The Chaffee’s smaller hull exacerbated the issue, making it nearly impossible for the crew to safely perform the task. A single mistake could result in a catastrophic accident. Consequently, the French Army abandoned the M24 (FL10) project and opted for the safer and more practical AMX-13-M24, which combined the AMX-13 hull with the M24 turret. A contract for 150 conversions to the AMX-13-M24 standard was issued in March 1960.


Specifications

M24 (FL10)

General Characteristics

  • Crew: 3 or 4 (driver, commander, gunner, bow gunner/radio operator)
    • Note: It remains unclear whether the bow gunner/radio operator position was retained in the M24 (FL10) configuration.
  • Dimensions
    • Nearly identical to the standard M24 Chaffee, with the exception of the FL10 turret and gun assembly.
  • Powertrain
    • 296-hp Twin Cadillac 44T24 8 cylinder petrol engine
    • Transmission: 8 speeds forward, 4 reverse
  • Combat Weight: ~19 tons
    • Note: This weight is an estimate based on rough calculations and may vary slightly.
  • Performance
    • Power-to-Weight Ratio: ~15.6 hp/ton
    • Speeds:
      • Forward: ~56 km/h (35 mph)
      • Backward: ~23 km/h (14 mph)

Armament & Armor

  • Main Gun
    • 75 mm SA50 cannon
      • Horizontal guidance: 360°
      • Vertical guidance -6° to +10°
      • Ammunition: 12 ready rounds in the turret + additional rounds stored in the hull (exact quantity unknown)
      • Ammunition Types:
        • POT-51A (APCBC)
        • OE Mle 1951 (HE)
Armor Penetration Chart

  • Secondary Guns
    • Coaxial 7.5 MAC 31 machine gun
      • Ammunition: 33 magazines with 150 rounds each (4,950 rounds total)
  • Armor
    • Hull:
      • Front: 25 mm
      • Sides: 25 mm
      • Rear: 19 mm
    • Turret:
      • Front: 40 mm
      • Sides: 20 mm
      • Rear: 20 mm

Images


Conclusion | Why it should be in the game

   Given that France was the largest operator of M24 Chaffees outside the United States, I believe the M24 (FL10) would be an excellent addition to the French Ground Forces in War Thunder. Its gameplay would resemble that of the E.B.R. (1954), though the M24 (FL10) would be a tracked vehicle. Additionally, since the E.B.R. (1954) is a premium vehicle, the M24 (FL10) could serve as a researchable option in the tech tree.


Sources


Thank you for taking the time to read my suggestion! 😃

15 Likes

+1
“But we already have AMX-13 at home!”

3 Likes

+1 more heavily modded stuff.
Somehow not ugly looking unlike the other AMX/M24 hybrid.

2 Likes

Cool tank but Gaijin will almost certainly put it at a br where it would be a pain to play and/or make it non tech tree. Im still pissed off about the amx13 at 6.7s and only the worst ebr being in the tech tree at f’ing 5.3…

5 Likes

i’m sure this would be fine around 4.7 - 5.3, it shouldn’t suffer too horribly considering the m24 has decent mobility and that french gun isn’t bad, neither is the ammo honestly, you just need to know where to shoot

4 Likes

with the amx13 being 6.7 and the m24 chassis having better reverse it will surely be at 7.0 or 7.3 and thus absolutely unplayable

3 Likes

absolutely not. i believe the highest it’ll get is 5.7, it has the same gun and ammo as the M4A1 (FL10) which is at 5.0. it has the same turret, same gun, same ammo. the E.B.R. (1954) which is at 6.7 has exactly the same stuff. i believe if it is added that they will put it much lower than the E.B.R. (1954).

3 Likes

You really underestimate Gaijin’s insanity when it comes to balancing vehicles, especially french mid tier tanks. I mean come on look at the amx-13, the EBR 1951, Char 25t, amx-13 HOT, etc… all way too overtiered and unbalanced

6 Likes

i understand your point, however, i’m just stating a personal opinion as i personally don’t believe it’ll end up past 5.7 simply because the counterpart which is the AMX-13-M24 is at 3.7.

2 Likes

Legitimately looks like a really fun vehicles
+1

1 Like

In this case we have M24 (FL-10) at home:

8 Likes

yet another great BP/event/squadron tank idea

+1, as the amx13 keep getting higher and higher because of their mobility, this would be a really good 5.~ alternative.

Why not tech tree? It’d go great with France’s 5.7 lineup.

1 Like

Well the AMX-M24 only has a 75mm M6.
I’d say this is perfect for exactly 5.7, being lower profile and more mobile than the M4 FL10 while also presumably having POT-51P, but less mobile and protected than the actual AMX-13

2 Likes

exactly the point i was trying to say, thanks for clarifying it better than i could have

1 Like

We need more FL-10s in the tech tree, only the AMX-13 is not enough.

Personally, I don’t see a world where this isn’t 6.7 along side the AMX-13. A side grade isn’t worthy of a lower BR, and if it is, Gaijin is admitting the AMX-13 is overtiered.

Maybe if it lacks the upgraded shell it could be 6.3, but there’s no way the AMX platform is better than the M24 platform.

If that’s the case, why should the AMX-13 be at 6.7 when it will be worse than this tank due to being having a worse platform?

it has better ammo.