South Africa doesn’t have enough vehicles for its own tree, and Britain needs a subtree anyways.
It took me a minute to realize with this image, that everything there is UK-operated only, with everything not British-operated having been removed, even in the premiums and events section.
Tho I do agree, hopefully, ZA gets its own tree(along with the other major commonwealth nations), while the UK receives its missing lend-lease(and domestic stuff).
1 Like
Simply wrong: Numerous suggestions on this board have shown that SA can receive it’s own unique tree, and it should. Why fill Britain with Gripens, Mirages, and other copy paste vehicles when the tree doesn’t need them?
Your point contradicts itself …
2 Likes
We don’t need China No.2. South Africa doesn’t have enough native vehicles to be a standalone tech tree.
Why wouldn’t you want every nation to have its own unique tree given the chance, why merge nations together?
If you don’t want to play ZAF vehicles, you don’t have too, but why put them into the GBR tree when said tree can already be fully populated with indigenous vehicles? I don’t understand your take on this :(
2 Likes
Because copy paste is bad
Ok, thinking about it the upsides of the UK getting this tank outweigh the the one downside.
As this would bring the UK a good light with great mobility(including a good reverse speed), on top of that it gets another vehicle with APHE and if the UK wants to stay playable it needs it.
Honestly I don’t see what’s the problem of nations getting stuff they used, even more so when TTs represent nations not industry, especially when the vehicle in question was used by the hundreds. (The only real issue is that Gaijin adds the C&P first but this vehicle wouldn’t have that problem with what domestic could come is already there)
2 Likes
No .50 cal. It is a copy and paste but considering no .50 makes it a bit more interesting to use. So vehicle wise C&P but gameplay wise=can’t be ass aggressive. n_nb