No Abrams for China, not after VT-4 drama
10 Likes
One of the threads that was similar to this, but for Singapore as a whole disappeared , i can’t seem to find it despite commenting on it an hour ago.
Also no Abrams for China. No one likes hypocrites.
4 Likes
That is why I started this with clean non political markings as these keep getting flagged for such offenses.
Ye,Chinese victory over Japan in WWII. And their issue was that date as patch was released near it. As Japan never apologized for atrocities against chinese,that was their problem with it…
2 Likes
I like this sentiment. I would prefer to see domestically produced tanks to bolster ANY nations top tier ranks.
And I think most would agree/prefer that!
2 Likes
The other one was closed because 2 fellas kept stat shaming each other , lets hope it doesnt happen again.
Back to the issue: I find it VERY hypocritical to just silence complaints like this.
The Chinese weren’t pleased, and gaijin listened
So if we complain , we should get what we want right?
Its not fair for them to bar the VT-4 for Japan ,but just hand a bunch of western vehicles to China without a second thought.
2 Likes
Just as irrelevant to a Thai vehicle as PRC and USA relations are to a PRC vehicle.
This one is fair though, since a delay doesn’t actually cause any harm or unfair treatment. It just avoids an unfortunate coincidence.
So long as it is actually a delay and not a cancellation this is fair.
2 Likes
Agreed. Relations/Politics aside following the same logic they are using for sub trees.
The sub tree uses that vehicle, the nation receives said vehicle.
And as long as it’s a delay yes, but we are well past that it seems. They fail to acknowledge it properly and just keep kicking the issue down the line. Now we have an opportunity to bring the hypocrisy to light.
Thing is,ROC isnt even subtree for China,its part of main tree,unlike Thailand for Japan.
1 Like
Yes, we indeed should get what we want. As the player base spending the money and time our requests should not be brushed off.
They need to at least understand what they are doing introducing the M1A2T directly after the VT-4 controversy.
1 Like
You as player base still spend significantly less than their chinese playerbase tho.
Appeasing the chinese again, just put them on their own server and lock it.
13 Likes
I have spent my fair share friend ;)
But I do understand what you mean by this. And that is why I am trying to shed light on it. If one side of the player base has the influence to remove a vehicle for a nations TT we should be able to do the same. (In theory)
I did aswell, but its probably still nothing compared to average chinese having most of premiums bought.
They did,Tencent server was a failure,noone played on it and it got shut down.
1 Like
Bring it back RN
1 Like
I would rather want ZTZ99A with APS or ZTQ-15 or ZBD-05. I dont understand why they arent focusing more on the indigenous vehicles. I also want lower tier chinese vehicles like the BK1990 (105). I would also like to see some better anti air for china…
2 Likes
THIS.
Home grown vehicles. A reason to grind and something to feel proud of. Nothing says that more than domestic production.
A reason to start researching a new nation! After all, why even research another nation if you’re just getting someone else’s vehicles!
4 Likes
As a German main, I have to say I couldn’t care less about the whole discussion.
My Leopards have been handed out to every Western nation — and usually in such a way that the best variant ends up belonging to another nation.
Usually justified by subtrees.
Now I even get to fly the F-15, because Switzerland has them…
At this point, it’s all just the same bland mix anyway.
2 Likes