Because your immediate response is to call american players bad at the game lol.
you’re welcome to quote me where I said exactly that and I will concede
1 Like
Brother… you liked the post, which clearly means you agree.
Let’s not change the story now. You know you liked that post because you agreed with what sneed said about american players.
Yeah, it wasn’t a great shot at all, however, poorly aimed shots can and often do kill tanks with worse survivability than an M1.
A ZTZ-99A, T-series tank or Merkava would’ve all likely gotten OHK’d from that shot due to them storing unprotected ammo in that section.
And it’s really just the disingenuousness that finally got under my skin.
5 Likes
did I already not tell you that I liked it because I agreed with sneed that such a dubious claim that the m1a2 doesnt have any advantages over the t90m is in fact very stupid?
why are you so desperate to spin this around to make it so that I ONLY liked that post because my hivemind super mega ultra anti-usa programming detected “usa players bad” in that post? seriously you’re grasping at straws here
2 Likes
POV you say that the Abrams is actually pretty good compared to most nations top tier tanks:
5 Likes
You’ve literally been trying to gaslight the entire thread that you aren’t toxic. When @SPANISH_AVENGER says that you actively supported some BEYOND TOXIC behavior, you immediately developed amnesia.
Do you seriously believe that the M1A2 SepV2 is better than the T-90M? Because I hardly believe anybody genuinely believes that… Maybe the Sepv1 is arguably better, however the SEPv2 is definitely a downgrade.
However, you skip over that just to act like US players are simply too stupid to have genuine problems with their tanks.
POV Casino_Knight posts another strawman
You people refuse to actually comment on the points people make, and instead run and say “BUT MERKAVA!”
“BUT ARIETE!!”
“BUT CHALLENGER 2!!!”
Each player can talk about the tank they want fixed. Nobody EVER said that the ABRAMS should solely be the tank that Gaijin chooses to fix, but you people choose to see it that way.
8 Likes
I don’t think you know what a strawman is and you should avoid trying to make yourself sound more intelligent by using words outside of their actual meaning.
1 Like
yes, me along with 26 other people apparently
those are some pretty serious allegations you’re throwing around buddy. I already told @spanish_avenger I would like to put the past be in the past and not open that can of worms but since you’re so eager to use the suffering of others to make a gotcha attempt on an internet forum I say go ahead
I suppose you have a shred of evidence to back up this portrayal of me doing the horrible things that happened in that thread
is this a projection?
1 Like
If you were literate you would have read your own google search and realised that what I posted was not a strawman. Instead you’re just further embarrassing yourself attempting to double down on your attempt to be a pseudo-intellectual.
3 Likes
Here it is, was wondering when he will show up.
Ladies and Gentleman, Casino Knight is here.
1 Like
Thanks for the introduction lackey, make sure you to throw some rose petals at my feet while you’re at it.
3 Likes
have you got any headcanon cooked up for him as well? lets hear it
2 Likes
Great attempt to flip this back onto me. You did what you did and refuse to accept any responsibility. Even if what you said was true, I think it’d pale in comparison to what you did.
No, it’s just the statement you literally agreed with.
This is what makes it feel like a campaign against the United States.
I have been present on every thread about legitimate concerns about every tank, and NO ONE has EVER been bothered by any of it;
No one bothered me addressing the issues of the Challengers, the Merkavas, the Arietes, the Chinese MBTs, the Leclercs or the Leopards… but as soon as a topic is made to discuss issues related to the Abrams, the thread becomes a rain of hellfire until the moderators have to intervene, close it and issue bans.
3 Likes
I’m always pleased to introduce toxic public enemies like you.
You’re welcome :)
Once again a thread full of people crying over non-issues on the abrams, blatantly asking for things the tank did not have irl or demanding it be put at a stupidly low BR because their understanding of ground combat is slamming their head against a wall till success.
I wish people complained about actual issues on the tank like for example its practically useless TUSK kit instead of demanding dumb things like an imaginary spall-liner or fictional hull DU
3 Likes
Three sources page 1 google say a strawman is an argument that distorts or exaggerates the meaning of the original topic, to put it in my own words. So, lets take a look at what you said.
Okay, okay. Now lets look at the post.
Interesting?? You know what I don’t see? Any text stating that the state of the Leclercs, the Challengers, the Merkavas, the Arietes, or any other tanks should be ignored in favor of the Abrams. Nobody said that. However, you distorted the argument and turned it into “IGNORE ALL OTHER TANKS IN FAVOR OF THE ABRAMS PLEASE”.
So there you go. What you posted was a strawman.