M1A2C Hull armor missing

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UA1UpEr7K589

not even giving a response

really feels like theyve just been told to say no to all of them

3 Likes

@Gunjob what is this about. a whole story is not enough info?

2 Likes

The response was added as you were typing this

1 Like

and it is completely nonsensical

1 Like

I was gonna tell him that :/

asdasdsadsadasdas

Its a very disappointing development

looks like telling chat GPT “deny this warthunder bug report” doesnt give a reasonable answer

Yeah the same guess they did for the turret cheeks.

A shame that is

1 Like

This is largely conjecture, but it’s believable conjecture and more importantly contains something approaching an actual Ballpark Estimate Number (though IMO I would read this as a maximum of 1000-1200 RHAe for implementation purposes since it’s… laaargely better to be conservative with these sorts of estimates)

There might be a wrinkle around what information around russian shells was available to american tank designers at the time, so this might just be another trail that leads directly to ‘all the necessary information is classified’, but I think it’s a worthwhile approach

Don’t think we could just contact every Bug manager Using the @ and have them fight it out right?

1 Like

Abrams with fully fixed turret ring and this would be a fortress

image
ah yes, just ignore all the sources that say the armor provides more protection

clearly they cant figure out that the action the devs need to take is improving the composite multiplier on the hull

4 Likes

Can we bug report bug report mangers there seems to be some issues with their ability to process information.

3 Likes

3 way domain clash

2 Likes

It’s something I guess more than likely does nothing though.

triple-domain-domain-expansion
Like this

Anyone else see that disappear