You claim that all US players though, and you are a US player.
Also average is a massive stretch already, since I expect average players to at least have some basic knowledge about core game mechanics like overpressure.
Which people had to educate you about earlier today.
Wow… insane.
Do you know how Relikt and Kontakt 5 works ?
Given that you’ve chosen to not provide any counterarguments to anything I said, I’ll just assume you’ve conceded.
As for that singular example, I’ll throw you a bunch more:
You also should’ve aimed lower and further towards the middle of the side instead of the front of the sides.
Wow, a compilation of non-penetrations from 10 years ago. I love it.
I hope you printed this out on an A4 sheet of paper as well?
If you treat your own examples and ‘evidence’ as valid and simultaneously dismiss anyone’s contradicting examples and evidence because it doesn’t suit you, you can continue believing anything.
It’s how Sovereign Citizens and flat Earthers operate.
But I can see that the armour advantage is working out great for you in your T-80UK with a 0.27 - 1 K/D ratio.
What I sent was a video from yesterday. It wasn’t from a year ago — it was recorded just yesterday, and I see cases like this in almost every battle.
Here’s another video, also from yesterday. After every battle, I review all the hits I received, and I have never had a situation where an Abrams fuel tank absorbed an entire APFSDS round or where an APFSDS round simply got stuck in the tracks.
That just doesn’t happen to me.
OMG, you started looking at statistics. That’s actually great, I love it when people check my stats. Thank you.
Although, on that T-80UK I was playing without APFSDS rounds, on a completely stock tank that wasn’t fully upgraded. But I was actually quite often not getting penetrated. That’s the truth.
I eventually stopped playing that tank and never even unlocked the APFSDS round.
Gee I wonder why.
If the T-series are as good and the Abrams are as easy to kill as you said none of that should make a difference.
Sounds like weak cope, a true SadRIPer moment.
This most likely only proves one thing: Abrams have weak armor, while the T-90M and T-80BVM have strong armor.
Too bad that the T-90M and T-80BVM are okay-mid in almost every other regard compared to the Abrams, which makes them so much worse.
Ah, ok.
I might have missunderstood.
Can you tell me how the M1A2C is the worst toptier ?
You shouldn’t be, those are not glorious. Especially for someone that has 22k battles.
Those are the stats of the ‘best players of toptier’ ?
16 battles and couldn’t get a rank 1 modification ?
Yeah, nope.
What, do you think you can quickly unlock the top APFSDS round without a premium account and while playing a stock tank?
Yep, as I just saw, best players in the game are US mains.
Are those really 5 shots against a single T-90M or multiple different ones?
Because 5 shots to kill a T-90M would be wild.
Looks like we’re playing on different servers. You’re on the special Gaijin servers where the T-90M gets one-shot every time, while I’m on the servers where the T-90M tanks APFSDS rounds with its fuel tanks, shells disappear, and all the usual stuff.
You’re so close to getting it, so close…
As expected, your aim is at fault.
Don’t blame the T-90M and T-80BVM for your aim being poor. You’ll fail to kill anything as long as you don’t know where to aim.
That T-90M should’ve required 2 shots at most, certainly not 4.
Literally my two last matches:
These are all of the shots taken against Russian stuff, it’s mostly just easy one-taps across the board.
