Minor tree mains tell us it’s our fault for exporting equipment and that’s why it’s scattered through every tree in game, but somehow their countries relying on equipment from various nations shouldn’t be held against them and they should all be in one tree anyways.
I love how the challys are so trash in terms of stats that they have to add other nations vics to make decent lineups XD
they made them even more trash by making the turntable a turret basket module. The abrams in the british tree is going to show up the america mains for being bad at least, just as the taiwanese one does
Put abrams even lower for gigs
I already met second person who on purpose put abrams lower for their agenda
I love this “AmEriCan MaIn Is BaD” logic. If you take a nation that’s played by more new players overall than other nations that have less, ofc they will be worse by mass. Example being Britain ofc its going to have better stats due to the terrible early grind that turns new players away from the UK. I myself play the Abrams a lot and dont mind playing them, sure there’s tons of bugs and armor issues but its still decent if not good.
You realize that what POV is ? 68º is the construction angle of the t80 not 64º… at anything over 100 m the impact angle will be around the construction angle.
I always find it funny how it’s always the German mains who have an issue with Britain getting sub nations, even though them themselves have been asking for the Swiss, Argentina, Poland, Denmark and the Netherlands.
Britain isn’t overtaking anyone in terms of the amount of subs since Japan also got three subs and is receiving a top tier tank from one of them.
At this point it’s just them being salty for the shakes of being salty…

dont mind the typo ;)
I’m already posted that even A2 can pen K5, because colors lie to you and people are too lazy to generate actual shot.
Now try to do the same with A3.
Dude, you literally shoot from below increasing effective thickness.
Dude, to get an impact angle of 65º at 200m you need a elevation diference of 10m… this is basic maths.

Btw i am slightly avobe the t90 anyways
this is set up so I am looking slightly down at the tank
note the 6 missing panels of K5 ERA, each of those individually ate a round of M829A3 at point blank
there is currently no reason to use this round over M829A2
How many shots K5 tanked?
I did second try because first one was too easy
Buddy, you even show how it was stopped… at 50m away, not even at point blank range you get what youre claiming, and like i said over 100m you have to place the camera at the same level of the impact
Did I pen K5 in both of my videos?
Literally first shot on the second video…
And what happened with two others?
Still not the angle you claim, otherwise it would never stop the round, let alone what you get at 200m











