on dev the 12.0 M1s still use A2
Spoiler
They should reall ybe 12.3 or higher by now but I digress.
It’s still gonna be a bonus int it
DM53 gonna get it’s ERA capabilities too?
1 Like
am I missing something? it’s a couple mm better than A2 point blank and a couple mm worse at 2km 60 degrees
Use the stat card.
1 Like
Thank you, kind sir but you Yankee can have this pos, we’d gladly take our lore accurate CR2/CR3.
The UK doesn’t need 4 sub trees. They would be fine without American vehicles.
M829A2: 629mm, 10m, 0 degrees. 364mm, 10m, 60 degrees. 345mm, 2km, 60 degrees.
M829A3: 633mm, 10m, 0 degrees. 366mm, 10m, 60 degrees. 344mm, 2km, 60 degrees.
Spoiler
2 Likes
Sorry mate but they shouldn’t have gotten India, also how four subtrees? last I checked they get South Africa and India.
If you had any idea about how the CommonWealth realms worked you’d never have just said what you did.
If the CR2 even a small part of it’s real life capabilities sure.
A3 is anit ERA mate. That’s what I was talking to @_Renzo about.
Its also nearly 3 KG heavier.
I agree but Gaijin won’t fix the lesser nations tanks, so we all have to have M1s, Leopard 2A7s or T series tanks to be competitive.
Blame Gaijin not me, that being said as someone who has Australian family this change is awesome
maybe not, but I want to play Australia in one TT.
Happy Kings birthday long weekend!
1 Like
I mean they had already been putting Aus into the British tree before, the only Aus vehicle not in the British tree is the M1A1 AIM from before.
2 Likes
and i don’t get why the people i quoted are calling it a trash round (compared to A2)? anti-ERA against K5 is at worst inconsequential, assuming you only ever see Relikt, and the pen performance is a couple mm either way going by the statcard.
Also 6.5 - 4.92 = 1.58, not sure where you’re getting 3kg heavier from? unless you’re talking about the way it should be implemented?
Why?
Likely this mate.
Not really true either is it, just cause america blows so much into it’s military budget doesn’t mean it’s inherently more advanced, hence why most european nations which are developing munitions are still either keeping up or ahead.
much akin to meteor VS the AIM 260 or whatever it is the US announced.
Yes, but that was a pretty major vehicle and didn’t bode well for how Australia would be treated.
While I don’t expect all Aussie vehicles to be added to the UK, like the P-51s, there are a number of interesting things I wouldn’t want scattered, the CAC “Avon Saber” the Aussie Mirage 3 also with an Avon engine, Tiger ARH and so on.
This is reasuring.
1 Like
I am agreeing with you, I just asked to see it’s statcard performance side by side.
The round will glide through pretty much most russian MBTs bar the top tier ones with relikt.
US mains likely just crying as they want some super round to one tap everything xd
Apologies, I glimpsed at the weights and seen 6.5, thought I seen 4.42 not 92.
Thanks for the correction.
Ofcourse, 100 percent agree man, the aussie vampires and such would be nice to see next as well!
1 Like
ohhhh my mistake, i interpreted that as “you’ll see if you check the statcard”
1 Like
India, South Africa, Canada, Australia.
I don’t care about the commonwealth. If the commonwealth wanted to be in one tree, they all should have used the same vehicles.
Australia shouldn’t have picked the Abrams and F18.
Gaijin isn’t fixing the Abrams either.