This is not the preferred reporting method to use, but there is an option to re-create a new report. But this has the disadvantage that the 200 “Ihave the same issue!” that agreed with us disappear.
As much as i can agree with your point, technical moderators didn’t asked for more sources, so at the current moment all those additional comments are not necessary, also, worth checking out, a good 50% of the comments are like that:
Do you think this is respectful towards the mod that are checking the reports? Just be patient and wait, its not like the report will magically disappear.
Come on, we can be a better community than that.
7 Likes
Their complaints and jokes can be vented in this forum.At least the report is not a place to write complaints about management or clowns. So what about putting the URL of this forum and directing them here? “Dear supporters, please send your grievances, complaints and complaints here.”
Im not the person that should do that, people should be mature enough to understand that by themself.
Indeed. Let’s leave this as a last resort in case people’s self-control wears off and they become like a mob. Hopefully they’ll get cool and calmer.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jh4806nWWEYT?comment=tYfa2JgP3LH7d3mUvOXKScvG
sigh
He is not a tech mod, and even if he is partially right he is missing the fact that the source have values and proper sources attached, that was the reason why i asked to not comment the bug report, because it basically made it a chatroom for people.
1 Like
It’s very, very sad to see reports being vandalised by fools like him who don’t look at the source. I hope these troll replies don’t affect the fairness of the clowns…
1 Like
This happend because, as i said, people keeped commenting over the report, this creates a lot of confusion, hopefully though the report will be seen today or tomorrow.
1 Like
My posts are there to clear up any confusion. I’m pointing out, correctly, that the updated forms modify the original License No. SUB-1536. All amendments have given the same status to the hulls as turrets. They removed any mention of limit on hulls or their location.
“3. License number SUB-1536 is renewed in
its entirety to read as follows” is pretty clear cut and solid. There are obvious changes to the documents and status of the hulls. On an AMENDMENT form.
In fact, Amendment No. 10 states it more explicitly:
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1619/ML16190A098.pdf
"3. License number SUB-1536 is AMENDED in its entirety
to read as follows: "
So there is absolutely no way he can correctly claim the license was never changed, altered, amended, etc… Even when the text that gives the hulls the same status as the turrets should have been self-explanatory enough.
8 Likes
Yeah but bug reports are not a forum place to discuss the validity of said things. This forum is here for that (both for you, the other guy and 80% of the posts under the bug report). They only help to clutter the report. That’s especially true since wareta already linked to the report from Kenny in which trickzzzter finally accepted the DU armor but refused the report for lack of numbers…
2 Likes
I don’t get why people are trying to use that document from 2006 about the 5 du hulls it’s clearly outdated.
2 Likes
I think they are using 2006 documents cause SEPv2 came to army in 2007, which means that army tests were in 2006.
LTSarcasm:
The license never changed.
Me:
Points out the license number being amended by forms.
LTSarcasm:
The turrets and hulls have always had the same status.
Me:
Believes authorizing UNLIMITED turrets but only authorizing 5 hulls is a difference in status. Points out the amended SUB-1536 changes the status of both turrets and hulls to “as needed” in the same line item being amended.
LTSarcasm:
Its the same license, it only allows 5 hulls.
The official documents clearly prove otherwise, but okay.
I don’t see how the document relates to m1a2 Sepv2 at all since the figure given in the document about the 5 hulls is stated as m1a1s. We already have documents disproving it anyway.
5 Likes
He’s probably just trying to derail the report.
3 Likes
Alright. I’m done pointing out what that says at this point. Either the mods will concede, or they’ll refuse unclassified official documents because they don’t want to upset the Slavaboos.
1 Like
I think we should wait to mods response, cause there is one russian named troll in some issues. Hopefully on monday there will be some answer ;-)
1 Like
Thermals need another bug report. Can someone ping him or make a bug report?
1 Like
Look at his in game stats, and you will instantly know the type of player you are dealing with. Ignore him.
3 Likes