As much as i can agree with your point, technical moderators didn’t asked for more sources, so at the current moment all those additional comments are not necessary, also, worth checking out, a good 50% of the comments are like that:
Do you think this is respectful towards the mod that are checking the reports? Just be patient and wait, its not like the report will magically disappear.
Their complaints and jokes can be vented in this forum.At least the report is not a place to write complaints about management or clowns. So what about putting the URL of this forum and directing them here? “Dear supporters, please send your grievances, complaints and complaints here.”
He is not a tech mod, and even if he is partially right he is missing the fact that the source have values and proper sources attached, that was the reason why i asked to not comment the bug report, because it basically made it a chatroom for people.
It’s very, very sad to see reports being vandalised by fools like him who don’t look at the source. I hope these troll replies don’t affect the fairness of the clowns…
This happend because, as i said, people keeped commenting over the report, this creates a lot of confusion, hopefully though the report will be seen today or tomorrow.
My posts are there to clear up any confusion. I’m pointing out, correctly, that the updated forms modify the original License No. SUB-1536. All amendments have given the same status to the hulls as turrets. They removed any mention of limit on hulls or their location.
“3. License number SUB-1536 is renewed in
its entirety to read as follows” is pretty clear cut and solid. There are obvious changes to the documents and status of the hulls. On an AMENDMENT form.
In fact, Amendment No. 10 states it more explicitly:
So there is absolutely no way he can correctly claim the license was never changed, altered, amended, etc… Even when the text that gives the hulls the same status as the turrets should have been self-explanatory enough.
Yeah but bug reports are not a forum place to discuss the validity of said things. This forum is here for that (both for you, the other guy and 80% of the posts under the bug report). They only help to clutter the report. That’s especially true since wareta already linked to the report from Kenny in which trickzzzter finally accepted the DU armor but refused the report for lack of numbers…
Me: Points out the license number being amended by forms.
LTSarcasm:
The turrets and hulls have always had the same status.
Me: Believes authorizing UNLIMITED turrets but only authorizing 5 hulls is a difference in status. Points out the amended SUB-1536 changes the status of both turrets and hulls to “as needed” in the same line item being amended.
LTSarcasm:
Its the same license, it only allows 5 hulls.
The official documents clearly prove otherwise, but okay.
I don’t see how the document relates to m1a2 Sepv2 at all since the figure given in the document about the 5 hulls is stated as m1a1s. We already have documents disproving it anyway.
Alright. I’m done pointing out what that says at this point. Either the mods will concede, or they’ll refuse unclassified official documents because they don’t want to upset the Slavaboos.