T-90MS is an export T-90M. It’s literally the same tank just exported.
I would like your documentation showing this. Export Abrams are of course the same thing, right?
3 Likes
Export Abrams tend to have non-DU options instead of DU, but otherwise they’re the same. Different manufacturers do different things as well.
You might have confused T-90SM and T-90MS BTW.
T-90MS is the T-90M but exported.
T-90A/SM is the T-90A/S but modernized.
Weird naming that I don’t know who did it.
Reminds me that there are two entirely different T-80UM2s that exist. One with APS and one with thermals, and neither are the same tank.
1 Like
You’d at least expect them to get a non-export version for changes to the non-export model. Some export tanks add or remove features at the customer’s request as well.
1 Like
That is fair.
It’s best to look at other reports next time tho.
Video/photographic evidence is used for visual proof a lot in reports.
Spall liner will be heavily video/photo evidence based, but also written in some cases where the spall liner looks very similar to metal… why Abrams…
4 Likes
Incidentally, they planned to add spall liners to many vehicles from below.This is why these reports were readily accepted. If you want to compare this case, you should bring the case of the LEO2A5PSO’s upper body armour. Much evidence was gathered but rejected.
This means that Bias™ is only activated when we request an unscheduled enhancement.
1 Like
Well we discovered today the requirements needed for armor.
Numbers, or indication of the numbers are needed.
I cannot say if the PSO reports had such requirements as the new report on Abrams by Wareta as I haven’t looked at them in some time, but if the PSO’s report didn’t that’d seem to be the first reason they were rejected.
Gajin have its moments. I expect them, for the time being to have some form of talk what the f- to do with these americans. This is number one thread and talking point over the few last days, hell, even many russian mains are supporting this! Lets hope for change of mind. Hopium is all we have left at this moment
6 Likes
Classic Gaijin
1 Like
We hope that the winds of freedom will blow in this game that Stalin has in mind. Balance in this game!
1 Like
A source is attached to the report:
Which means something was used to back up the video, which would make perfectly sense, i don’t understand your point.
1 Like
I don’t know, I haven’t seen it for a long time,If the report is correct, that means the trickster played along.
1 Like
The only source we see is a Youtube clip of a different tank than the one the report is filed for.
1 Like
All im telling you that the bug report have a source attached to it, you can’t see it because they are hidden for everyone except technical moderators and the user that created the bug report, you can’t say that the YouTube video was the only thing used for the bug report because you don’t have access to the sources submitted.
4 Likes
Fair, but the only visible source is one of a different model of tank. No pushback whatsoever.
We can see plenty of pushback in recent reports.
1 Like
I understand your point, only the user and tech mods know what’s attached on the sources though.
1 Like
@Gunjob sorry to ping you and i know you don’t handle these but can you ask for your team to forward a dedicated official responder for this thread ?
this is getting out of hand
8 Likes
He literally says in the post that the attached item is a screenshot from the link.
It’s the weekend.
They don’t really do much on the weekends, and as annoyed as I am with the Devs and very acute sections of the mod team, I don’t begrudge them taking it easy on the weekend.
1 Like